Abstract
In order to investigate the influence of yield function on the accuracy of predicting forming limit curve (FLC) for sheet metal, Mises, Hill48 and Yld2000-2d yield functions were implemented in the M-K model. The parameter identification methodology of Hill48 and Yld2000-2d anisotropic yield functions was also investigated. For the AA5182-O aluminium alloy and TRIP780 steel sheets, the parameters of yield functions were identified respectively and the FLCs were numerically predicted with the identified yield functions. By comparison of the predicted uniaxial yield stresses, uniaxial anisotropic coefficients and FLCs with the experimental results, the Yld2000-2d yield function is found to be more accurate for modelling the anisotropy and formability of sheet metal than Mises and Hill48 yield functions, especially in the biaxial tension region of FLC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Microstructure and Materials Properties
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
