Abstract
Microorganisms are famous for adapting quickly to new environments. However, most evidence for rapid microbial adaptation comes from laboratory experiments or domesticated environments, and it is unclear how rates of adaptation scale from human‐influenced environments to the great diversity of wild microorganisms. We examined potential monthly‐scale selective pressures in the model forest yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Contrary to expectations of seasonal adaptation, the S. paradoxus population was stable over four seasons in the face of abiotic and biotic environmental changes. While the S. paradoxus population was diverse, including 41 unique genotypes among 192 sampled isolates, there was no correlation between S. paradoxus genotypes and seasonal environments. Consistent with observations from other S. paradoxus populations, the forest population was highly clonal and inbred. This lack of recombination, paired with population stability, implies that selection is not acting on the forest S. paradoxus population on a seasonal timescale. Saccharomyces paradoxus may instead have evolved generalism or phenotypic plasticity with regard to seasonal environmental changes long ago. Similarly, while the forest population included diversity among phenotypes related to intraspecific interference competition, there was no evidence for active coevolution among these phenotypes. At least ten percent of the forest S. paradoxus individuals produced “killer toxins,” which kill sensitive Saccharomyces cells, but the presence of a toxin‐producing isolate did not predict resistance to the toxin among nearby isolates. How forest yeasts acclimate to changing environments remains an open question, and future studies should investigate the physiological responses that allow microbial cells to cope with environmental fluctuations in their native habitats.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Paradoxus Population
Abiotic Changes
Saccharomyces Paradoxus
Seasonal Environmental Changes
Killer Toxins
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Conservation Biology
Jul 19, 2010
Functional Ecology
Sep 26, 2016
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Nov 1, 2022
FEMS Yeast Research
Sep 24, 2010
PeerJ
Dec 5, 2018
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Jul 1, 2008
Global NEST: the international Journal
Oct 22, 2020
bioRxiv
Apr 30, 2021
Ecology and Evolution
Feb 1, 2023
Molecular Ecology
Sep 17, 2022
Journal of Ecology
Aug 2, 2016
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Dec 1, 2005
Ecology and Evolution
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Ecology and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023