Abstract

Studies of loess subsidence soils under conditions of their long-term soaking and water filtration were performed. A set of predictive factors characterizing the composition and properties of loess soil responsible for its long-term deformation during soaking is revealed. A method of predicting the value of post-shrinkage compaction based on probabilistic analogies using the Bayes formula is proposed.

Highlights

  • Slow-subsidence soils include loess-like and loess-like medium and heavy loam, the dispersed component of which is represented mainly by montmorillonite [1]

  • The main problem of the control of subsidence on these soils follows from the fact that the current regulations (SP 22.13330.2016, GOST 23161-2012 [4,5]) provide for the determination of subsidence indicators: the value of the relative subsidence of the εsl and the initial subsidence pressure of the Psl in compression devices by short-term soaking of soil samples in conditions of their capillary water saturation

  • The results shown in table 2 show that the value of postseeding compaction depends on most indicators and primarily on the content of gypsum in loess soil, aggregation of the dispersed fraction and density of dry soil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Slow-subsidence soils include loess-like and loess-like medium and heavy loam, the dispersed component of which is represented mainly by montmorillonite [1]. The main problem of the control of subsidence on these soils follows from the fact that the current regulations (SP 22.13330.2016, GOST 23161-2012 [4,5]) provide for the determination of subsidence indicators: the value of the relative subsidence of the εsl and the initial subsidence pressure of the Psl in compression devices by short-term soaking of soil samples in conditions of their capillary water saturation. This test scheme is not fully consistent with the actual conditions of the bases and foundations, especially when flooding areas. Type of soil conditions on the subsidence of 80% of the city - I, and 20% of the territory - II. [7] The maximum drawdown of the thickness from its own weight reaches 20-25 cm (calculated according to compression tests according to the scheme of “two curves”) [8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.