Five-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test in Evaluation of Disease Burden in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

Multidisciplinary consensus on a stepwise treatment algorithm for management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Fevipiprant in CRSwNP and comorbid asthma: Wrong target population or wrong PGD2 receptor?

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)

Biologics and the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis

Dupilumab improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and comorbid asthma

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: What should we do now without direct comparison trials?

Outside of SINUS-24 (A Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Bilateral Nasal Polyps) and SINUS-52 (Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps), there are limited data on the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The objective was to compare dupilumab with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in patients with CRSwNP by assessing the change in nasal polyp and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores postintervention. A retrospective matched cohort study compared 54 patients who had CRSwNP treated with dupilumab with 54 patients who had CRSwNP treated with FESS; both cohorts were treated with topical corticosteroids. The primary end points were change in nasal polyp score and overall SNOT-22 score. Secondary end points were change in SNOT-22 domain scores and SNOT-22 olfaction score. Patients who underwent FESS had a greater improvement in nasal polyp score (5.18±2.01) compared with patients treated with dupilumab (4.27±1.98, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of the change in overall SNOT-22 score. Patients treated with dupilumab had greater improvement in the extranasal rhinologic SNOT-22 domain scores (4.87±3.91) compared with patients treated with FESS (2.93±4.32, p=0.02). There was a greater improvement in the SNOT-22 olfaction scores for patients treated with dupilumab (2.35±2.17) compared with patients treated with FESS (1.48±2.24, p=0.04). Patients taking dupilumab were followed on average for 12.20months and patients treated with FESS were followed for 17.90months. Overall, both therapies are effective at reducing symptoms in patients with CRSwNP according to SNOT-22. Patients treated with dupilumab reported improved olfaction and decreased cough, postnasal drainage, and thick nasal drainage as compared with patients treated with FESS, while patients treated with FESS had a greater reduction in polyp burden.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) significantly impacts quality of life and often presents therapeutic challenges, with biologics like dupilumab showing promise in managing severe, uncontrolled cases. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of overweight on the effectiveness of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP. This retrospective study analyzed treatment outcomes of 75 CRSwNP patients receiving dupilumab, categorizing them into underweight/normal-weight (BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) groups. Outcome measures included changes in nasal polyp score (NPS) and sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores. Results demonstrated that the underweight/normal-weight group experienced significantly greater improvements in NPS and a higher rate of total NPS improvement compared to the overweight/obese group. While SNOT-22 scores improved in both groups, no significant differences were observed. Among patients with comorbid asthma, the underweight/normal-weight subgroup also showed significantly better outcomes, including greater reductions in both NPS and SNOT-22 scores. Multiple regression analysis identified BMI as an independent prognostic factor for NPS outcomes. The findings suggest that overweight/obesity adversely affects the response to dupilumab in CRSwNP, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies considering BMI.

Rapid and sustained effects of dupilumab in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Objective: The upcoming introduction of mepolizumab represents a promising treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mepolizumab on sinonasal outcomes of comorbid CRSwNP and severe asthma in a real-life setting. The primary endpoint was to evaluate changes in the SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 score, Nasal Polyp (NP) score, and blood eosinophil count during a 12-month treatment with mepolizumab. Secondary endpoints were to quantify mepolizumab’s effects on the mentioned parameters, identify clinical variables influencing the degree of response to treatment, and portray responder and nonresponder patients. Methods: A multicentric retrospective no-profit observational study on severe asthmatic patients, treated with mepolizumab, and comorbid CRSwNP was conducted. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. SNOT-22 score, NP score, and blood eosinophil count (and other CRS-specific variables) were collected at baseline and after 12 months. Results: Forty-three patients were included. A statistically significant reduction was observed for SNOT-22 score (mean t0 SNOT-22 54.8 ± 25.9; mean t12 SNOT-22 31.5 ± 21.3, p < 0.0001), NP score (median t0 NPS 3 (IQR 3); median t12 NPS 2 (IQR 4), p < 0.0001), and blood eosinophil count (mean t0 blood eosinophils 804.7 ± 461.5 cell/µL; mean t12 blood eosinophils 107.5 ± 104.6 cell/µL, p < 0.0001) after 12 months of treatment. Twenty patients (47%) gained improvement both in clinical and endoscopic outcome. Mepolizumab responder patients presented a t0 SNOT-22 significantly higher than nonresponders (p = 0.0011). Conclusions: Mepolizumab improved CRSwNP outcomes in a population of severe asthmatic patients. No clinical feature emerged to outline the profile of a “typical” responder patient, except for baseline SNOT-22 score, which seemed to affect the response to treatment. Further studies would be necessary to supplement these preliminary evaluations.

Reply

Basophils are elevated in nasal polyps of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without aspirin sensitivity

BackgroundThe alignment between objective scores and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is underexplored. This study aimed to assess changes in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients undergoing dupilumab treatment and explore correlations between these scores.MethodsCRSwNP patients received dupilumab therapy for six months. SNOT-20 German Adapted Version (GAV)/SNOT-22 scores were assessed weekly, and NPS was measured at baseline and after one, three, and six months. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation and regression analysis.Results69 patients were included. After one, three and six months of dupilumab therapy, SNOT and NPS scores improved significantly. Correlation analysis of SNOT and NPS showed significant correlations only within the nasal subscores, along with a weak trend for SNOT-20. Absolute changes over time lacked significance. However, correlation analysis revealed significant associations between relative changes in SNOT score and NPS, irrespective of timing, and when stratified by baseline NPS of 8, 6, and 4 (r = -0.54, p = 0.01; r = -0.44, p < 0.001; r = -0.7, p < 0.001). This was supported by linear regression modeling, suggesting potential predictive capability of NPS reduction on relative SNOT score improvement.ConclusionDupilumab therapy significantly improved subjective and objective CRSwNP scores, exhibiting weak correlations in absolute values for nasal subscores. Furthermore, evidence indicated a correlation between relative changes in SNOT score and NPS, substantiated by predictive capability. This might be due to subjective perception variability, highlighting the suitability of relative change correlation analysis.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa with nasal polyp formation. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of biological therapies, including omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab, compared with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in CRSwNP management. A literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified five studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing biological therapies or ESS in adults with CRSwNP. The primary outcomes were nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal congestion score, Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and adverse events. Omalizumab showed significant improvements in NPS, nasal congestion score, and SNOT-22 scores compared to placebo, with sustained effects in an open-label extension study. Mepolizumab significantly reduced SNOT-22 scores, improved lung function, and decreased blood eosinophil counts and systemic corticosteroid use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and CRSwNP. Benralizumab improved NPS and nasal blockage scores compared to placebo, with effects varying by comorbidities and baseline characteristics. ESS with medical therapy showed better SNOT-22 scores than medical therapy alone, though not reaching the minimal clinically important difference. Biological therapies and ESS were well tolerated, with adverse events comparable to those of the placebo. This review demonstrates the effectiveness of biological therapies and ESS in managing CRSwNP, particularly in severe cases of the disease. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these interventions in CRSwNP management.

This study evaluates the enduring efficacy and patient satisfaction of dupilumab with interdose interval adjustments based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients who had been treated with dupilumab for over 6 months. This study targeted individuals diagnosed with CRSwNP according to the 2020 edition of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Criteria. The treatment involved an add-on dupilumab regimen, where the interdose interval was adjusted based on the SNOT-22 scores. Dosage adjustments were made such that patients with initial SNOT-22 scores greater than 40 were tapered to a target level of 20 or less. Similarly, for patients with initial scores of 40 or less, the treatment aimed for an improvement of 50% or more. At each visit, the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated using SNOT-22, nasal polyp scores (NPS), and a subjective satisfaction questionnaire adapted from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v.1.4). The adjustment of the interdose interval for dupilumab based on SNOT-22 scores demonstrated sustained improvements in patients' subjective symptoms, satisfaction, and NPS. The mean (standard deviation) SNOT-22 scores significantly decreased from 46.04 (22.30) to 14.72 (13.66) over 6 months (P<0.001). Similarly, NPS scores improved from 3.20 (2.24) to 1.72 (1.46) within the same period (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 5, consistently remained above 3.5 for up to 6 months (P=0.166). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in the nasal symptom domain of the SNOT-22 scores and higher satisfaction scores. Adjusting dupilumab dosing intervals based on SNOT-22 scores from the outset resulted in sustained efficacy and patient satisfaction in Korean patients with CRSwNP. This approach will meaningfully assist clinicians in determining the optimal dupilumab dosing interval.