Abstract

AbstractAnimal resource requirements differ among life‐history stages, and thus, habitat is most appropriately thought of as specific to a particular life stage. Accordingly, different habitats may vary in their significance as functions of (1) the sensitivity of population growth to the life stage for which the habitat is most important, (2) spatial association of each habitat to other habitats, and (3) the abundance of the habitat in question. We used an analogy to a life‐table response experiment to develop spatial models linking key habitats to rates of population increase in Greater Sage‐grouse. We parameterized models linking demographic rates to vegetation and physical attributes of habitats, including spatial association of some habitats to others, using a decade‐long study of Greater Sage‐grouse in central Nevada. We modeled the contribution of each pixel in the landscape to regional λ (finite rate of population increase) using functional relationships between demographic rates and the attributes of that pixel, and the sensitivity of λ to each demographic rate. We incorporated the following demographic rates into our model: female nesting success, survival of chicks from hatching to 45 d, and adult female annual survival. We also incorporated the probability a site was used for nesting. Chick survival (62%) and nest site selection (21%) explained most of the variance in lambda. We found that only ~8% of all habitat for Greater Sage‐grouse contributed to λ > 1. Habitat supporting population growth occurred in mid‐high elevation areas with moderate slopes, and a high percent cover of sagebrush, and in nesting areas close to late‐brood habitat. Our models indicate that a relatively small proportion of habitat available to Greater Sage‐grouse in central Nevada is responsible for maintenance of the population in our study system. We suggest that the general approach we describe here can be used to improve understanding of habitats most likely to regulate populations in other systems, providing an important tool in ecology and conservation.

Highlights

  • Animals in heterogeneous environments survive and reproduce at different rates associated, in part, with variation in the structure and composition of the habitats they occupy (Fretwell and Lucas 1970, Rosenzweig 1981, Pulliam and Danielson 1991)

  • Some land areas may be more important in regulating population dynamics than others as demographic surpluses arise in habitat where reproduction is sufficient to sustain population growth and demographic deficits occur in habitat where this is not true (Pulliam 1988)

  • Spatial habitat influence on population dynamics We found that only ~8% of land available in Eureka County, served as a net source for sagegrouse (k ≥ 1; Fig. 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals in heterogeneous environments survive and reproduce at different rates associated, in part, with variation in the structure and composition of the habitats they occupy (Fretwell and Lucas 1970, Rosenzweig 1981, Pulliam and Danielson 1991). Variation in survival and recruitment among individuals that results from habitat variability is important because the collective demographics of individuals drive population-level dynamics Some land areas may be more important in regulating population dynamics than others as demographic surpluses arise in habitat where reproduction is sufficient to sustain population growth (source habitat) and demographic deficits occur in habitat where this is not true (Pulliam 1988). Characterization of the various combinations of areas available to local populations and their influence on individuals’ space use, survival, and reproduction has, been less common

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.