Abstract
First-principles calculations based on density functional theory have been used to study the surface energies of the rutile TiO2(110) and (011)-2×1 surfaces. We investigate the effect of the slab thickness on the predicted surface energy and find that slab thicknesses of at least 5 layers are necessary to converge the surface energy to within 0.01 J/m2for both rutile TiO2(110) and (011)-2×1 surfaces. For the rutile TiO2(110) surface, it should be noted that the surface energy oscillates with the number of layers (odd-even oscillations). However, the calculated surface energies of the rutile TiO2(011)-2×1 surface are closer to the linear relationship for the number of layers larger than 4. Finally, our calculated results indicate that the rutile TiO2(011)-2×1 surface has a significantly higher surface energy than the rutile TiO2(110) surface.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
