First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) + 2 cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients (pts) with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 3-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

9560 Background: In Part 1 of the phase II CheckMate 568 study (NCT02659059), NIVO + IPI was active and tolerable in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. The addition of chemo to dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy may further improve initial disease control. We report results from Part 2 of CheckMate 568, which evaluates NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo in pts with advanced treatment-naive NSCLC. Methods: Adult pts with untreated stage IV NSCLC received NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W combined with 2 cycles of histology-based platinum-doublet chemo, followed by NIVO + IPI without chemo until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity for ≤ 2 years. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within the first 9 weeks and safety/tolerability. Treatment was considered safe if ≤ 25% of at least 22 evaluable pts had a DLT. DLTs included but were not limited to: uncontrolled grade 3 non-skin treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), grade 4 TRAEs, grade 2 treatment-related pneumonitis not resolved within 14 days, and treatment-related hepatic function abnormalities. Results: In total, 36 pts received treatment; 97% of pts completed 2 cycles of chemo combined with NIVO + IPI. Three pts discontinued IPI while continuing NIVO. Minimum follow-up was 14.9 months. Only 1 (3%) pt experienced a DLT (transient, asymptomatic grade 3 AST and ALT elevation) within the first 9 weeks. The elevation occurred on cycle 1, day 21 and resolved 2 weeks later with discontinuation of IPI, delay of NIVO, and treatment with prednisone; chemo was continued throughout and NIVO was restarted thereafter without recurrent toxicity. Grade 3–4 TRAEs occurred in 21 (58%) pts. Eight (22%) pts experienced a TRAE leading to discontinuation, most commonly colitis, encephalopathy, pneumonitis, and arthralgia (each in 2 [6%] pts); these events occurred outside of the 9-week window for DLT assessment. The most common select TRAEs (defined as AEs of potential immunologic causes) were skin related (18 [50%] pts); the most common grade 3–4 select TRAEs were endocrine (3 [8%] pts), skin related, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary (each in 2 [6%] pts). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Updated safety in addition to efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: In pts with untreated advanced NSCLC, the addition of 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemo to NIVO + tumor-optimized IPI was tolerable. No unexpected safety signals were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02659059 .

The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts approximately 85% of lung cancers and includes predominantly adenocarcinomas, which is the most common type and squamous cell carcinomas. The treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy and the decision depends on the patient’s medical status and stage of disease. From 1970 the standard first line treatment for most patients with unresectable NSCLC and good performance status was the use of a combination of chemotherapy regimens and usually cisplatin-based. The most common combination regimens in use at present are platinum based regimens with gemcitabine, with paclitaxel or docetaxel and with vinorelbine combinations. The addition of the recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of non-squamous advanced NSCLC has demonstrated to increase response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to chemotherapy alone. Despite recent advances with approval of more active chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenesis agents for stage IV NSCLC, standard therapy can provide only modest clinical benefits with significant toxicities when used in unselected patients. In 2004, the identification of somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene provided the first glimpse of a possible target for a treatment which could maximize clinical outcome in those patients who could benefit from a personalized therapy. Identifying mutations in oncogenes associated with non-squamous NSCLC can help determine which patients are more likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Such oncogenes include EGFR, KRAS, and ALK. The presence of an EGFR mutation confers a more favorable prognosis and strongly predicts for sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib. The use of EGFR TKIs is based upon the detection of these mutations. The incidence of EGFR mutations in tumors with non-small-cell histology ranges from ~15% in Caucasians to ~50% in East Asians; 95% of such mutations have been found in adenocarcinomas. Patients bearing EGFR mutations have shown favorable clinical outcomes even with conventional chemotherapy suggesting that EGFR may be a predictive and a prognostic factor. Activation of the EGFR protein stimulates protein tyrosine kinase, which leads to activation of signaling pathways associated with cell growth and survival. Both EGFR overexpression and activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene lead to tumor growth and progression. Erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib are examples of EGFR TKIs that can prevent activation of the signaling pathways and improve RRs in selected NSCLC patients. These mutations which are associated with increased sensitivity to EGFR TKIs, predominate in never-smokers, females, and tumors with adenocarcinoma histology. The most common mutations associated with sensitivity to EGFR TKIs include exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation and they are associated with RRs of >70%. Other EGFR mutations like T790M and exon 20 insertion, have been associated with much lower response or acquired resistance to TKI’s. The predictive value of EGFR mutations for use of gefitinib has been strengthened by the results of three randomized phase III trials that specifically compared TKIs used as first-line therapy with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In 2009 the results of IRESSA Pan-Asia Study were presented. This trial included a big number of Asian ethnicity patients (1,217) who were never smokers or former light smokers with histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The trial demonstrated an improvement in PFS and RR, with no statistical difference in OS, with the use of gefitinib in EGFR-mutated tumors and better RR and PFS with standard chemotherapy in patients without mutations. The first phase III trial of gefitinib versus chemotherapy as initial treatment of recurrent or advanced NSCLC, based on selection of patients with known activating EGFR mutations was the WJTOG3405 trial, reported in 2010. This trial documented important achievements in RR and PFS with the use of TKIs. Almost the same results were confirmed by another similar Japanese phase III trial, NEJ002, with RR and PFS definitely favoring the use of gefitinib in the first-line setting of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on the results of the IPASS study, gefitinib was approved for use in Europe for the initial treatment of patients with NSCLC exhibiting EGFR mutations. The positive results of the EURTAC trial, NCT00446225, which was a randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy, suggested that responsiveness in mutation-positive patients was not a function of ethnicity. Afatinib is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of EGFR TKI—naïve adults with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations in the EU, and for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test in the US. In two randomized, open-label, multinational phase III trials, progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 3) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 6) in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKIs as a class are generally well tolerated. The two most common toxicities include dermatologic and GI effects, which are mild to moderate, easily managed and reversible. In order to determine whether an EGFR TKI or chemotherapy is the appropriate first-line therapy, the latest guidelines recommend mutation testing for all patients with advanced NSCLC tumor. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations in first line of treatment. These agents are recommended as first line treatments for NSCLCs with such mutations. The primary endpoint will be the PFS and the secondaries will be the OS and the record of the toxicities. In each of the 3 arms will be participate 20 patients with EGFR mutated tumors. The technique for screening NSCLC patients for driver mutations that it will be used is next-generation sequencing, which overcomes many of the shortcomings of direct sequencing. This massively parallel approach, relying heavily on automation, data storage, and computational processing, allows quantitative analysis of infrequent alleles and simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes or even whole genomes, but is not yet used routinely in clinical practice. In addition, KRAS mutation analysis will be performed in patients with known smoking history in order to determine the correlation of type and mutation frequency with smoking.

Brief Report: First-line Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Habouring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation and PD-L1 ≥50% (GFPC 01-20 Study)

92 Background: Nivolumab (BMS-936558/ONO-4538), a fully human IgG4, PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitor antibody, has shown durable clinical activity in several tumor types. Recently, two phase III studies (CheckMate-017 and -057) demonstrated that nivolumab improved overall survival (OS) than docetaxel in second-line of squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (NSQ) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), respectively. Here, we report the results of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Korean patients (pts) with previously treated advanced SQ and NSQ NSCLC. Methods: This study requires pts aged ≥ 20 years with ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0 or 1, stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC and at least one prior chemotherapy including platinum containing regimen. Pts received nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint in this study was the objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Results: Nivolumab was administered to 100 NSCLC pts (SQ: 44, NSQ: 56), male/female: 78 (SQ: 44, NSQ: 34)/22 (SQ: 0, NSQ: 22); PS 0/1: 14 (SQ: 6, NSQ: 8)/86 (SQ: 38, NSQ: 48); aged 29 to 80 [median: 66.5] years (SQ: 40 to 80 [median: 69.5], NSQ: 29 to 77 [median: 63.5]); Stage IIIB/IV/recurrence: 6 (SQ: 5, NSQ: 1)/91 (SQ: 37, NSQ: 54)/3 (SQ: 2, NSQ: 1)). In SQ and NSQ NSCLC, ORR was 15.9% (7/44) and 23.2% (13/56), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 mo and 5.3 mo, respectively. Complete Response was observed in 2.3% (1/44) and 1.8% (1/56), respectively. Median OS was 12.3 mo and 16.3 mo, respectively. Median follow-up was 8.9 mo and 12.3 mo, respectively. Most common adverse drug reaction (ADR) was decreased appetite 15.9% (7/44), followed by pyrexia 9.1% (4/44) in SQ NSCLC, and decreased appetite 12.5% (7/56), followed by pruritus 10.7% (6/56), fatigue 8.9% (5/56), pyrexia 5.4% (3/56) and nausea 5.4% (3/56) in NSQ NSCLC. Grade 3-4 ADR was observed in 6.8% (3/44) and 10.7% (6/56) of SQ and NSQ NSCLC, respectively. No interstitial lung disease and no grade 5 ADRs were observed in this study. Conclusions: Nivolumab was considered to be effective and used safely in Korean pts with SQ and NSQ NSCLC as well as in non-Korean pts with SQ and NSQ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02175017.

9501 Background: NIVO + IPI was shown to improve overall survival (OS) and durability of response vs chemo in 1L advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1, regardless of PD-L1 expression. We hypothesized that a limited course of chemo combined with NIVO + IPI could provide rapid disease control while building on the durable OS benefit seen with dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706) is a phase 3 randomized study evaluating NIVO + IPI + 2 cycles chemo vs chemo in 1L stage IV/recurrent NSCLC. Methods: Adults with tx-naive, histologically confirmed stage IV/recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status 0–1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles) (n = 361) or chemo (4 cycles) alone (n = 358), stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Chemo was based on histology. Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-only arm could receive optional pemetrexed maintenance. Pts were treated with immunotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for 2 y. The primary endpoint was OS; the interim analysis using Lan–DeMets alpha spending function with O’Brien–Fleming boundary was planned at ~80% information fraction (ie, after observing ~322 total events). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by PD-L1 subgroups. Exploratory endpoints included safety/tolerability. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms. At a preplanned interim analysis (minimum follow-up 8.1 mo), OS was significantly prolonged with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo (HR 0.69, 96.71% CI: 0.55–0.87; P = 0.0006); statistically significant improvements in PFS and ORR were seen. With longer follow-up (minimum 12.7 mo), NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo continued to provide longer OS; median 15.6 vs 10.9 mo (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55–0.80); 1-y OS rates were 63 vs 47%. Clinical benefit was consistent across all efficacy measures in key subgroups including by PD-L1 and histology. Grade 3–4 tx-related adverse events were reported in 47 vs 38% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo arms, respectively. Conclusions: CheckMate 9LA met its primary endpoint: a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed with NIVO + NSCLC-optimized IPI + a limited course of chemo vs chemo (4 cycles) in 1L advanced NSCLC. No new safety signals were reported. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706 .

9016 Background: 1L NIVO + IPI was shown to provide durable long-term overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemo regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826); 3-year OS rates were 33% vs 22% in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67–0.93]) and 34% vs 15% in pts with PD-L1 < 1% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51–0.81]). Here we report updated results from the study with 4 years’ minimum follow-up. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled; pts were stratified by squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (NSQ) histology. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (n = 1189) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO alone (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 550) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. OS with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% was the primary endpoint. Results: With minimum follow-up of 49.4 months (database lock, Feb 18, 2021), pts were at least 2 years beyond the protocol-specified end of immunotherapy treatment. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% continued to show durable benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.90]); 4-year OS rates were 29% (NIVO + IPI), 21% (NIVO), and 18% (chemo). At 4 years, 14% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO), and 4% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 34%, 30%, and 7% remained in response, respectively. In an exploratory analysis in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4-year OS rates were 37% (NIVO + IPI), 26% (NIVO), and 20% (chemo). In pts with PD-L1 < 1%, OS HR for NIVO + IPI vs chemo was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.81); 4-year OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 13% (NIVO + chemo) and 10% (chemo). At 4 years, 12% (NIVO + IPI), 7% (NIVO + chemo), and 0% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 31%, 13%, and 0% remained in response, respectively. Among pts who progressed on NIVO + IPI vs chemo, 7% vs 40% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%), and 9% vs 33% (PD-L1 < 1%), received subsequent immunotherapy. Benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed for both SQ and NSQ histology (Table). With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: With 4 years’ minimum follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI continued to provide durable, long-term OS benefit vs chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

LBA9025 Background: In CheckMate 227 part 1 (NCT02477826), 1L NIVO + IPI demonstrated long-term, durable survival benefit vs platinum-doublet chemo in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level. Here we present the longest reported follow-up (5 y) of a phase 3 trial of 1L combination immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and an ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled and stratified by histology. Pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. Pts were treated until progression, toxicity, or ≤ 2 y for immunotherapy. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and a novel efficacy endpoint, treatment-free interval. Treatment-free interval was measured in pts who discontinued study therapy (for any reason including treatment completion) and was defined as the time from last study dose to start of subsequent systemic therapy or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Minimum follow-up was 61.3 mo (database lock, Feb 15, 2022). In pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% (N = 1189), continued long-term OS benefit was seen with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66–0.91]); 5-y OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 17% (NIVO), and 14% (chemo). OS benefit also continued in pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% (N = 550) for NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52–0.81]); 5-y OS rates were 19% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO + chemo), and 7% (chemo). Clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed across additional efficacy endpoints in the overall population and in pts alive at 5 y (table). PFS, ORR, and DOR with NIVO and NIVO + chemo will be presented. Among pts alive at 5 y in the NIVO + IPI group, 66% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 64% (PD-L1 < 1%) remained treatment-free ≥ 3 y after discontinuing study therapy; median (range) duration of NIVO ± IPI therapy was 17.7 (0-25.5) mo (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 9.5 (0-25.1) mo (PD-L1 < 1%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With a 5-y minimum follow-up, NIVO + IPI continues to provide long-term, durable clinical benefit vs chemo in previously untreated pts with metastatic NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression. NIVO + IPI led to increased 5-y survivorship; the majority of these pts were treatment-free for ≥ 3 y post-treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

LBA4_PR - Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 227 part 1 final analysis

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the phase III CheckMate 227 Part 2 trial

In Italy, the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma leads to significant healthcare challenges, necessitating cost-effective treatment strategies and offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and stakeholders. This study was designed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with the health and economic outcomes of (1) pembrolizumab-combined chemotherapy administered as a first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous and squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where the tumour presents with a programmed death-ligand 1 expression level <50% and of (2) adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment for stage III melanoma. Three cost-effectiveness models developed by MSD were investigated for each treatment indication. A unique model was built to assess the overall effect of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or watchful waiting in patients with lung cancer or melanoma, respectively. Theoretical cohorts of patients with metastatic squamous and non-squamous NSCLC were followed over time using a partitioned survival model with weekly cycles. A weekly cycle Markov model was employed for melanoma. The analysis was conducted from the Italian National Health Service perspective, considering a time horizon of 40 years (lifetime). A single closed cohort of treatable patients was followed over time for each indication (4000, 7000 and 900 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma, respectively). The costs evaluated included those for adverse drug events, non-drug disease management, subsequent treatment and terminal care. Drug acquisition and administration costs were excluded. For each treatment indication assessed, pembrolizumab produced downstream direct cost offsets (- €122,498,568, -€133,369,076 and -€32,993,242 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively), increased quality of life (+2088, +5317 and +2307 QALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively) and reduced disability (-2658, -7202 and -3029 DALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively). Across indications, the total cost offsets of pembrolizumab were -€288,860,885, with 9712 QALYs gained and 12,889 DALYs avoided. The analysis demonstrated that, compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab is more cost effective in Italy as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC and, if compared with watchful waiting, as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III melanoma. The present analysis suggested that pembrolizumab use could lead to important health benefits for patients while offsetting a portion of cancer care costs.

Introduction: Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) has become an attractive antibody drug conjugate (ADC) target as it is expressed in multiple solid tumors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an ADC composed of a Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 by a hydrolysable linker, has demonstrated activity and is approved in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and in metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. EVOKE-01 (NCT05089734) evaluated the efficacy and safety of SG vs docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after receiving platinum chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. The study did not meet statistical significance for the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) at final analysis; numerical improvement in OS was seen with SG vs docetaxel. To date, the biomarkers associated with the clinical efficacy of SG in NSCLC are not well characterized. We performed a retrospective analysis of exploratory biomarkers to evaluate their predictive/prognostic value. Methods: Exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted in the biomarker evaluable population (BEP; N=380), representing 63% of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with biomarker data available. Trop-2 protein expression was assessed using the EPR20043 FLA IHC assay (Roche-Tissue Diagnostics) and scored by a pathologist based on H-scores. The clinical data used for biomarker analyses were from the study’s final analysis (cutoff date: 29NOV2023). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between BEP and ITT; similar to the ITT population, there was no statistically significant difference between treatments. Trop-2 protein was highly expressed in NSCLC tumor samples, consistent with previous observations. Trop-2 expression was similar in both treatment arms with a median H-score of 190 and was slightly higher in squamous vs non-squamous NSCLC. Trop-2 expression was also similar among subgroups of patients with different best responses (SD/PD vs CR/PR) to last prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Analysis of Trop-2 correlation with clinical outcomes showed that higher Trop-2 expression did not predict better OS with SG vs docetaxel; median OS hazard ratios (95% CI) with SG vs docetaxel were 0.89 (0.60-1.32) and 0.96 (0.68-1.38) in the &amp;lt;190 and ≥190 Trop-2 H-score subgroups, respectively. Median OS was shorter in ≥190 vs &amp;lt;190 Trop-2 H-score subgroups with both SG (8.90 vs 11.79 mo) and docetaxel (9.76 vs 10.71 mo). Results were consistent in squamous and non-squamous subgroups. Conclusion: Exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted to identify potential biomarkers that are either predictive for SG or prognostic for NSCLC. Trop-2 was highly expressed in NSCLC, albeit not predictive of better OS with SG compared with docetaxel. Trop-2 may be a negative prognostic biomarker in this NSCLC population, independent of treatment received in the study. Citation Format: Marina Chiara Garassino, Peiwen Kuo, Niels Reinmuth, Nicolas Girard, Giannis Mountzios, Mariano Provencio, Yvonne Summers, Marcello Tiseo, Shan Tang, Riddhi Patel, Sabeen Mekan, Juliane M. Jürgensmeier. Potential prognostic/predictive biomarkers for sacituzumab govitecan in EVOKE-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB260.

4O Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) in CheckMate 227 part 1: Efficacy by KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutation status

Anti-PD-1/PD(L)1-based combination therapy is the standard of care in first line (1L) for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (mnsqNSCLC) without driver alterations. This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in this population. Eligible physicians in the United States, Europe, and Japan abstracted information from medical charts of eligible adult patients with mnsqNSCLC (without EGFR/ALK, no known ROS1 alterations) who initiated 1L anti-PD(L)1-based combination therapy for mnsqNSCLC between 2017 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) after 1L initiation. Overall, 142 physicians contributed deidentified data from 430 patients' medical charts. The distribution of PD-L1 expression levels was 31.2% with tumor proportion score (TPS) <1%, 42.3% with TPS 1%-49%, and 26.5% with TPS ≥50%. In 1L, patients received anti-PD(L)1 + chemotherapy (84.6%), anti-PD(L)1 + anti-CTLA4 with or without chemotherapy (11.9%), and anti-PD(L)1 + chemotherapy + anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (3.5%). The median OS was 21.7 months (TPS <1%: 18.3 months; TPS 1%-49%: 21.6 months; TPS ≥50%: 24.0 months). The median TTD was 11.0 months (TPS <1%: 9.1 months; TPS 1%-49%: 10.9 months; TPS ≥50%: 12.2 months). The median rwPFS was 11.2 months (TPS <1%: 9.3 months; TPS 1%-49%: 11.1 months; TPS ≥50%: 13.2 months). This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of 1L anti-PD(L)1-based combination therapy for mnsqNSCLC. Results from this study were generally consistent with previous clinical trials and published real-world evidence in 1L mnsqNSCLC.

PC02.04 IO Should Be Given with Chemo