Abstract

Finite-time thermodynamic models for an Otto cycle, an Atkinson cycle, an over-expansion Miller cycle (M1), an LIVC Miller cycle through late intake valve closure (M2) and an LIVC Miller cycle with constant compression ratio (M3) have been established. The models for the two LIVC Miller cycles are first developed; and the heat-transfer and friction losses are considered with the effects of real engine parameters. A comparative analysis for the energy losses and performances has been conducted. The optimum compression-ratio ranges for the efficiency and effective power are different. The comparative results of cycle performances are influenced together by the ratios of the energy losses and the cycle types. The Atkinson cycle has the maximum peak power and efficiency, but the minimum power density; and the M1 cycle can achieve the optimum comprehensive performances. The less net fuel amount and the high peak cylinder pressure (M3 cycle) have a significantly adverse effect on the loss ratios of the heat-transfer and friction of the M2 and M3 cycles; and the effective power and energy efficiency are always lower than the M1 and Atkinson cycles. When greatly reducing the weights of the heat-transfer and friction, the M3 cycle has significant advantage in the energy efficiency. The results obtained can provide guidance for selecting the cycle type and optimizing the performances of a real engine.

Highlights

  • Internal combustion engines have achieved great success especially in the automotive industry.A diesel engine can achieve a higher thermal efficiency, but with more NOx and soot emissions and higher cost and NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH)) level compared with an Otto cycle engine

  • The less net fuel amount and the high peak cylinder pressure (M3 cycle) have a significantly adverse effect on the loss ratios of the heat-transfer and friction of the M2 and M3 cycles; and the effective power and energy efficiency are always lower than the M1 and Atkinson cycles

  • The results showed that the efficiency at the maximum power density was greater than that at the maximum power

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Internal combustion engines have achieved great success especially in the automotive industry. A diesel engine can achieve a higher thermal efficiency, but with more NOx and soot emissions and higher cost and NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH)) level compared with an Otto cycle engine. The cost of Otto cycle engines is less, but the thermal efficiency is limited because of low CR (compression ratio (CR)). A great improvement of the thermal efficiency for Otto cycle engines is difficult. The attention on Atkinson and Miller cycle engines is greater and greater in recent years because of the high level of thermal efficiency and special applications in hybrid vehicles [2,3,4]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.