Abstract

Noise barriers are a critical part of noise mitigation in urban and rural areas. In this study, a comparison of the insertion loss calculations of noise barriers via the Finite Element Method (FEM) and various formulae (Kurze–Anderson, ISO 9613-2/Tatge, Menounou) is presented in the case of two-dimensional acoustic radiation problems. Some of the cases explored include: receiver in the illuminated zone, in the shadow zone, in the shadow border, source in medium, long, short distance from the barrier, source and receiver near barrier, and source above the barrier. Comparisons of the results indicate that FEM results comply well (less than 1 dB in each case) with Menounou’s formula which in turn complies with the analytic solution (MacDonald Solution). In certain cases, the differences between FEM and Menounou’s formula compared to Kurze–Anderson and ISO 9613-2/Tatge formulae are substantial (source and receiver near the barrier (10 dB) and source near the barrier and receiver in the shadow border (5 dB)). Similar differences are also confirmed by the analytic solution. The findings suggest that FEM can be applied effectively for the precise estimation of the insertion loss of noise barriers. Especially in cases where ISO 9613-2 formula shows large deviations from the analytic solution (e.g., near barrier), possible applications may arise in cases such as balconies, facades, etc. Furthermore, the study supports the idea that FEM could possibly be effectively utilized in real life applications for microscale urban acoustic modeling as a viable alternative to expensive noise prediction software.

Highlights

  • A noise barrier can be considered as any solid obstacle that impedes the line of sight between the source and receiver and creates a sound shadow [1]

  • We present results from the application of Finite Element Method (FEM) as well as various formulae regarding the acoustic behavior of noise barriers

  • Results obtained with FEM were compared with various formulae and especially the Menounou formula which comply well with the analytic solution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A noise barrier can be considered as any solid obstacle that impedes the line of sight between the source and receiver and creates a sound shadow [1]. Noise barriers are an important aspect of fighting noise pollution both in urban and rural areas caused by major infrastructure projects such as roads, railways, and airports. In the context of improving the urban environment and in order to meet recommended guideline values for community noise (e.g., World Health Organization (WHO) [2]), implementing noise barriers is one of the most used and effective methods. Noise barriers come in many forms and shapes. The use of numerical methods is of great importance in their development as well as in the evaluation of their effectiveness. We can mention barriers with diffracting edge modifications such as T-shaped barriers [3], multiple-edge barriers [4], Urban Sci. 2020, 4, 77; doi:10.3390/urbansci4040077 www.mdpi.com/journal/urbansci

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.