Abstract
Structured child and adolescent treatments, tested through controlled clinical trials, have produced beneficial effects in hundreds of studies. By contrast, the limited pool or research on traditional clinical treatments raises doubts about their effectiveness. Thus, identification of empirically supported treatments may contribute something of real value to clinical practice and training. The Child Task Force report represents an important initial step in this direction. Here we offer both praise and critique, suggesting a number of ways the task force process and product may be improved. In addition, we suggest several ways to strengthen and enrich the clinical trials research available to the Task Force, emphasizing the need to test empirically supported treatments with referred youth in practice settings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
