Abstract

In this paper, we study the financing decision for an emission-dependent supply chain with one supplier and one manufacturer, both of which are financially constrained and in need of short-term financing for emission abatement. Three kinds of financing strategies are considered: (1) bank financing separately (BFS), (2) the manufacturer obtains partial loans from the bank, and borrows from the supplier (MPB), (3) the supplier obtains partial loans from the bank, and borrows from the manufacturer (SPB). The BFS is viewed as a noncollaborative financing strategy, and the MPB and SPB are collaborative financing strategies. The financing strategies are obtained at the point where wholesale price, production quantity, and emission reduction are endogenously determined. We found that the collaborative financing strategy is beneficial to the supplier and the whole supply chain compared with the noncollaborative financing strategy, the SPB strategy may outperform the MPB strategy for the supplier and the whole supply chain, depending on sharing proportion. The advantage of the MPB and SPB strategies relative to the BFS strategy mainly depends on sharing proportion from the manufacturer's perspective. We demonstrated that the collaborative financing strategy is the equilibrium strategy of the emission-dependent supply chain under certain conditions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.