Abstract
Rhizobium inoculant products in North America are often prepared using non-sterile peat and may contain more contaminants than rhizobia. The effectiveness of sterile and non-sterile peat-based inoculants applied to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seed using either traditional seed inoculation just before planting, or pre-inoculated and commercially coated, were evaluated for three years (eight harvests) at two sites in northwestern Alberta. Seeds inoculated just before planting had more rhizobia at planting time than pre-inoculated seed. When results from all the three years were combined, inoculation with Rhizobium, either seed-applied or pre-inoculated, significantly (P<0.05) increased nodule dry matter (DM) at both sites. However, the response of forage N and DM yields to inoculation were significantly higher with seed application than with seed coating at one site, and vice–versa at the other site. Differences resulting from the use of non-sterile peat or sterile peat were not significant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
