Feasibility of catheter ablation with zero-fluoroscopy in congenital heart disease

Abstract

Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) with zero and near-zero fluoroscopy has been shown to be safe and effective in patients (pts) without structural heart disease, but there are limited data regarding CA in congenital heart disease (CHD). Aim Our aim was to compare the safety and outcome of zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) and fluoroscopy (non-ZF) CA of CHD pts. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of CHD pts who underwent CA at our center between 2006-2020. The ZF and non-ZF groups were compared for the complexity of anatomy, arrhythmia substrate, difficulties of vascular access, transseptal or transbaffle puncture, intracardiac pacemaker/ICD, procedural parameters, complications, and acute outcome. Near-ZF CAs (effective dose ≤1 mSv) were assigned to the ZF group. Results The ZF group included 22 pts (age: 22±13 years) and the non-ZF group 48 pts (age: 31±12 years). The distribution of CHD anatomical complexity (mild/moderate/severe) was 18.2%-68.2%-13.6% in the ZF group and 14.6%-68.7%-16.7% in the non-ZF group. Arrhythmia diagnoses were focal atrial tachycardia (ZF: 4.6%), atrial flutter (ZF: 45.4%, non-ZF: 75.0%), atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) via manifest accessory pathway (AP) (ZF: 31.8%, non-ZF: 10.4%), AVRT via concealed AP (ZF: 4.6%, non-ZF: 8.3%), and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (ZF: 13.6%, non-ZF: 6.3%). Difficulties in vascular access occurred in 4.5% of the ZF group and 18.8% of the non-ZF group (p=0.10). The rate of transseptal/transbaffle puncture was significantly higher in the non-ZF group (22.9% vs. 4.6%, p=0.04). In the ZF group 13.6% and in the non-ZF group 20.8% of pts had pacemaker or ICD (p=0.22). Electroanatomical mapping was used in all CAs in both groups. There was no significant difference in procedure time, ablation time and the number of radiofrequency applications (ZF group: 169±53 min, 1205±906 sec, 28±15 vs. non-ZF group: 203±74 min, 1459±940 sec, 34±16, p>0.05). The acute success rate was 100% in both groups. No complications occurred in any group. Conclusion Zero fluoroscopic CA was feasible in 1/3 of the pts with CHD and as safe and effective as fluoroscopic ablation. No significant differences were found in the non-fluroscopy related procedural data between the two groups.