Feasibility of Basal Ganglia Microelectrode Recordings under General Anesthesia with Combined Nitrous Oxide and Sevoflurane: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

Movement disorder surgery Part I: historical background and principle of surgery

INTRODUCTION Recent studies show similar clinical outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) under general anesthesia without microelectrode recording (MER), so-called “asleep” DBS, compared to historical cohorts undergoing “awake” DBS with MER guidance. Very few studies, however, include internal controls. This study compares clinical outcomes following globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS using awake and asleep techniques at a single institution. METHODS PD patients undergoing awake or asleep bilateral GPi or STN DBS were prospectively followed. The primary outcome measure was stimulation-induced change in motor function 6 months postoperatively, measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) with the patient off medication. Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life, measured by the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), change in levodopa daily equivalent dose (LEDD), stereotactic accuracy, stimulation parameters, and adverse events. RESULTS >Six-month outcome data were available for 133 patients treated over 45 months (78 GPi [16 awake, 62 asleep] and 55 STN [14 awake and 41 asleep]). UPDRS-III score improvement with stimulation did not differ between awake and asleep groups for GPi (awake = 20.8 points [38.5%], asleeP = 18.8 points [37.5%], P = 0.45) or STN (awake = 21.6 points [40.3%], asleeP = 26.1 points [48.8%], P = 0.20) targets. The percentage improvement in PDQ-39 and LEDD was similar for awake and asleep groups for both GPi (P = 0.80, P = 0.54, respectively) and STN cohorts (P = 0.85, P = 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION In PD patients, bilateral GPi and STN DBS utilizing the asleep method resulted in motor, quality-of-life, and medication reduction outcomes comparable to the awake method.

Objective:To determine how intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER) and intraoperative lead placement acutely influence tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. Secondarily, to evaluate whether the longevity of the MER and lead placement effects...

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi), deep brain stimulation (DBS) on individual action tremor/postural tremor (AT) and rest tremor (RT) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Randomized DBS studies have reported marked benefit in tremor with both GPi and STN and DBS, however, there is a paucity of information available on AT vs RT when separated by the surgical target.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the 1-year clinical outcome of PD patients treated with STN and GPi DBS at the University of Florida. We specifically selected patients with moderate to severe AT. Eighty-eight patients (57 STN and 31 GPi) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months for changes in AT and RT in the OFF-medication/ON stimulation state. A comparison of “response” was performed and defined as greater than or equal to a 2-point decrease in tremor score.ResultsSTN and GPi DBS both improved AT at 6- and 12-months post-implantation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). The STN DBS group experienced a greater improvement in AT at 6 months compared to the GPi group (p = 0.005) but not at the 12 months follow-up (p = 0.301). Both STN and GPi DBS also improved RT at 6- and 12-months post-implantation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). There was no difference in RT scores between the two groups at 6 months (p = 0.23) or 12 months (p = 0.74). The STN group had a larger proportion of patients who achieved a “response” in AT at 6 months (p < 0.01), however, this finding was not present at 12 months (p = 0.23). A sub-analysis revealed that in RT, the STN group had a larger percentage of “responders” when followed through 12 months (p < 0.01).ConclusionBoth STN and GPi DBS reduced PD associated AT and RT at 12 months follow-up. There was no advantage of either brain target in the management of RT or AT. One nuance of the study was that STN DBS was more effective in suppressing AT in the early postoperative period, however, this effect diminished over time. Clinicians should be aware that it may take longer to achieve a similar tremor outcome when utilizing the GPi target.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) have differential therapeutic effects for Parkinson's disease (PD) that drive patient selection. For example, GPi DBS is preferred for dystonic features and dyskinesia, whereas STN DBS has shown faster tremor control and medication reduction. Connectivity studies comparing these two targets, using patient-specific data, are still lacking. The objective was to find STN and GPi structural connectivity patterns in order to better understand differences in DBS-activated brain circuits between these two stimulation targets and to guide optimal contact selection. The authors simulated DBS activation along the main axis of both the STN and GPi by using volume of activated tissue (VAT) modeling with known average stimulation parameters (2.8 V and 60 μsec for STN; 3.3 V and 90 μsec for GPi). The authors modeled VATs in the anterior, middle, and posterior STN and the anterior, midanterior, midposterior, and posterior GPi. The authors generated maps of the connections shared by the patients for each VAT by using probabilistic tractography of diffusion-weighted imaging data obtained in 46 PD patients who underwent DBS (26 with STN and 20 with GPi targeting), and differences between VATs for whole-brain and distal regions of interest (prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, primary motor cortex, primary sensory cortex, caudate, motor thalamus, and cerebellum) were generated from structural atlases. Differences between maps were quantified and compared. VATs across the STN and GPi had different structural connectivity patterns. The authors found significant connectivity differences between VATs for all regions of interest. Posterior and middle STN showed stronger connectivity to the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area (SMA) (p < 0.001). Posterior STN had the strongest connectivity to the primary sensory cortex and motor thalamus (p < 0.001). Posterior GPi showed stronger connectivity to the primary motor cortex (p < 0.001). Connectivity to the SMA was similar for the posterior and midposterior GPi (p > 0.05), which was greater than that for the anterior GPi (p < 0.001). When both nuclei were compared, posterior and middle STN had stronger connectivity to the SMA, cerebellum, and motor thalamus than GPi (all p < 0.001). Posterior GPi and STN had similar connectivity to the primary sensory cortex. On patient-specific imaging, structural connectivity differences existed between GPi and STN DBS, as measured with standardized electrical field modeling of the DBS targets. These connectivity differences may correlate with the differential clinical benefits obtained by targeting each of the two nuclei with DBS for PD. Prospective work is needed to relate these differences to clinical outcomes and to inform targeting and programming.

Background:Mutations in the G-protein subunit alpha o1 (GNAO1) gene have recently been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy and movement disorders. The clinical manifestations of GNAO1-associated movement disorders are highly heterogeneous. However, the genotype–phenotype correlations in this disease remain unclear, and the treatments for GNAO1-associated movement disorders are still limited.Objective:The objective of this study was to explore diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for GNAO1-associated movement disorders.Methods:This study describes the cases of three Chinese patients who had shown severe and progressive dystonia in the absence of epilepsy since early childhood. We performed genetic analyses in these patients. Patients 1 and 2 underwent globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation, and Patient 3 underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation. In addition, on the basis of a literature review, we summarized and discussed the clinical characteristics and outcomes after DBS surgery for all reported patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders.Results:Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis revealed de novo variants in the GNAO1 gene for all three patients, including a splice-site variant (c.724–8G > A) in Patients 1 and 3 and a novel heterozygous missense variant (c.124G > A; p. Gly42Arg) in Patient 2. Both GPi and STN DBS were effective in improving the dystonia symptoms of all three patients.Conclusion:DBS is effective in ameliorating motor symptoms in patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders, and both STN DBS and GPi DBS should be considered promptly for patients with sustained refractory GNAO1-associated dystonia.

STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation for tremor suppression in Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Do patient's get angrier following STN, GPi, and thalamic deep brain stimulation

IntroductionThe globus pallidus internus (GPi) region has evolved as a potential target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). DBS of the GPi (GPi DBS) is an established, safe and effective method for addressing many of the motor symptoms associated with advanced PD. It is important that clinicians fully understand this target when considering GPi DBS for individual patients.MethodsThe literature on GPi DBS in PD has been comprehensively reviewed, including the anatomy, physiology and potential pitfalls that may be encountered during surgical targeting and post-operative management. Here, we review and address the implications of lead location on GPi DBS outcomes. Additionally, we provide a summary of randomized controlled clinical trials conducted on DBS in PD, together with expert commentary on potential applications of the GPi as target. Finally, we highlight future technologies that will likely impact GPi DBS, including closed-loop adaptive approaches (e.g. sensing-stimulating capabilities), advanced methods for image-based targeting and advances in DBS programming, including directional leads and pulse shaping.ResultsThere are important disease characteristics and factors to consider prior to selecting the GPi as the DBS target of PD surgery. Prior to and during implantation of the leads it is critical to consider the neuroanatomy, which can be defined through the combination of image-based targeting and intraoperative microelectrode recording strategies. There is an increasing body of literature on GPi DBS in patients with PD suggesting both short- and long-term benefits. Understanding the GPi target can be useful in choosing between the subthalamic (STN), GPi and ventralis intermedius nucleus as lead locations to address the motor symptoms and complications of PD.ConclusionGPi DBS can be effectively used in select cases of PD. As the ongoing DBS target debate continues (GPi vs. STN as DBS target), clinicians should keep in mind that GPi DBS has been shown to be an effective treatment strategy for a variety of symptoms, including bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor control. GPi DBS also has an important, direct anti-dyskinetic effect. GPi DBS is easier to program in the outpatient setting and will allow for more flexibility in medication adjustments (e.g. levodopa). Emerging technologies, including GPi closed-loop systems, advanced tractography-based targeting and enhanced programming strategies, will likely be future areas of GPi DBS expansion. We conclude that although the GPi as DBS target may not be appropriate for all PD patients, it has specific clinical advantages.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00220-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Motor signs of Parkinson’s disease such as tremor and bradykinesia are independently expressed and exhibit distinct signatures of neural activity that can independently decoded from subthalamic and cortical recordings using interpretable machine learning.

Recent studies have shown similar clinical outcomes between Parkinson disease (PD) patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) under general anesthesia without microelectrode recording (MER), so-called “asleep” DBS, and historical cohorts undergoing “awake” DBS with MER guidance. However, few studies include internal controls. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes after globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS using awake and asleep techniques at a single institution. PD patients undergoing awake or asleep bilateral GPi or STN DBS were prospectively monitored. The primary outcome measure was stimulation-induced change in motor function off medication 6 months postoperatively, measured using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life, measured by the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), change in levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), stereotactic accuracy, stimulation parameters, and adverse events. Six-month outcome data were available for 133 patients treated over 45 months (78 GPi [16 awake, 62 asleep] and 55 STN [14 awake, 41 asleep]). UPDRS-III score improvement with stimulation did not differ between awake and asleep groups for GPi (awake, 20.8 points [38.5%]; asleep, 18.8 points [37.5%]; p = 0.45) or STN (awake, 21.6 points [40.3%]; asleep, 26.1 points [48.8%]; p = 0.20) targets. The percentage improvement in PDQ-39 and LEDD was similar for awake and asleep groups for both GPi (p = 0.80 and p = 0.54, respectively) and STN cohorts (p = 0.85 and p = 0.49, respectively). In PD patients, bilateral GPi and STN DBS using the asleep method resulted in motor, quality-of-life, and medication reduction outcomes that were comparable to those of the awake method.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an effective treatment for parkinsonian motor signs. Though its therapeutic mechanisms remain unclear, it has been suggested that antidromic activation of the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a significant role in mediating its therapeutic effects. This study tested the hypothesis that antidromic activation of M1 is a prominent feature underlying the therapeutic effect of STN and GPi DBS. Single-unit activity in M1 was recorded using high-density microelectrode arrays in two parkinsonian nonhuman primates each implanted with DBS leads targeting the STN and GPi. Stimulation in each DBS target had similar therapeutic effects, however, antidromic activation of M1 was only observed during STN DBS. Although both animals undergoing STN DBS had similar beneficial effects, the proportion of antidromic-classified cells in each differed, 30 versus 6%. Over 4 h of continuous STN DBS, antidromic activation became less robust, whereas therapeutic benefits were maintained. Although antidromic activation waned over time, synchronization of spontaneous spiking in M1 was significantly reduced throughout the 4 h. Although we cannot discount the potential therapeutic role of antidromic M1 activation at least in the acute phase of STN DBS, the difference in observed antidromic activation between animals, and target sites, raise questions about its hypothesized role as the primary mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of DBS. These results lend further support that reductions in synchronization at the level of M1 are an important factor in the therapeutic effects of DBS.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recently there has been great interest and debate regarding the potential role of motor cortical activation in the therapeutic mechanisms of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease. In this study we used chronically implanted high density microelectrode arrays in primary motor cortex (M1) to record neuronal population responses in parkinsonian nonhuman primates during subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. Our results suggest a contribution of antidromic activation of M1 during STN DBS in disrupting synchronization in cortical neuronal populations; however, diminishing antidromic activity over time, and differences in observed antidromic activation between animals and target sites with antidromic activation not observed during GPi DBS, raise questions about its role as the primary mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of DBS.

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPI) deep brain stimulation (DBS) effectively treat motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) but may be associated with cognitive and psychiatric changes in some patients. Evaluation of changes in cognitive and psychiatric symptoms following DBS is complicated by changes in these symptoms that occur as part of the natural disease course. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether electrode position was associated with changes in neurocognitive symptoms in patients who underwent STN and GPI DBS. A single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with PD who underwent DBS from 2008 to 2019. Cognitive and psychiatric outcomes included Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score, presence of impulsive-compulsive behavior (ICB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and overall cognitive status grade determined by comprehensive neuropsychology testing (normal, mild impairment, moderate impairment, and dementia). Pre- and postoperative comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t-test. Patients with and without cognitive decline were compared using a Mann-Whitney U-test or unpaired t-test. A chi-square test was used for categorical comparisons. One hundred thirty patients were included (mean age 62.5 ± 7.9 years). At a mean postoperative follow-up from DBS of 13.0 ± 12.7 (range 6-66) months, there was an improvement in ICB (26.3% preoperatively vs 15.0% postoperatively, p = 0.017), but a decline in MMSE score (28.6 ± 1.6 vs 27.6 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and overall cognitive status (normal: 66.2% vs 39.2%; mild: 12.3% vs 17.7%; moderate: 21.5% vs 33.1%; dementia: 0.0% vs 10.0%; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing STN DBS had a worse decline in overall cognitive status than patients who underwent GPI DBS (p = 0.006). Postoperative cognitive decline was associated with a more medial electrode position only for patients who underwent STN DBS. Cognitive change was observed in some patients with PD who underwent both GPI and STN DBS, likely due partly to underlying disease progression. Compared with GPI DBS, STN DBS was associated with a greater likelihood of cognitive decline. In STN but not GPI DBS, cognitive decline was associated with medialized electrode position, suggesting modulation of nonmotor STN divisions may contribute to cognitive changes following STN DBS.

Concern about cognitive worsening, especially after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been reported in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, although it has not been deemed severe enough to discredit DBS as a powerful tool in the armamentarium against PD. We here provide an in-depth and critical review of the current literature on this topic, summarizing the available data on the impact of STN and globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS on each of the following cognitive domains: language, executive function, attention and concentration, memory, visual function, psychomotor and processing speed, and global cognition; then looking in more details into controlled studies as well as studies directly comparing GPi and STN DBS. We conclude that worsening of one or more cognitive function is rare and subtle after DBS in PD patients, without negative impact on quality of life, and that there is very little data supporting that STN DBS has a worse cognitive outcome than Gpi DBS.

GPi and STN deep brain stimulation can suppress dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease