Abstract

Head and neck cancers centered at the base of skull are better visualized on MRI than on CT. The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the accuracy of bulk density assignment in head and neck intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plan optimization. Our study investigates dose calculation differences between density‐assigned MRI and CT, and identifies potential limitations related to dental implants and MRI geometrical distortion in the framework of MRI‐only‐based treatment planning. Bulk density assignment was performed and applied onto MRI to generate three MRI image sets with increasing levels of heterogeneity for seven patients: 1) MRIW: all water‐equivalent; 2) MRIW + B: included bone with density of 1.53 g/cm3; and 3) MRIW + B + A: included bone and air. Using identical planning and optimization parameters, MRI‐based IMRT plans were generated and compared to corresponding, forward‐calculated, CT‐based plans on the basis of target coverage, isodose distributions, and dose‐volume histograms (DVHs). Phantom studies were performed to assess the magnitude and spatial dependence of MRI geometrical distortion. MRIW‐based dose calculations overestimated target coverage by 16.1%. Segmentation of bone reduced differences to within 2% of the coverage area on the CT‐based plan. Further segmentation of air improved conformity near air–tissue interfaces. Dental artifacts caused substantial target coverage overestimation even on MRIW + B + A. Geometrical distortion was less than 1 mm in an imaging volume 20 × 20 × 20 cm3 around scanner isocenter, but up to 4 mm at 17 cm lateral to isocenter. Bulk density assignment in the framework of MRI‐only IMRT head and neck treatment planning is a feasible method with certain limitations. Bone and teeth account for the majority of density heterogeneity effects. While soft tissue is well visualized on MRI compared to CT, dental implants may not be visible on MRI and must be identified by other means and assigned appropriate density for accurate dose calculation. Far off‐center geometrical distortion of the body contour near the shoulder region is a potential source of dose calculation inaccuracy.PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.55.‐D

Highlights

  • The advent of conformal radiation therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has necessitated precise target delineation, allowing for improved local control by maximizing tumor dose while minimizing normal tissue exposure

  • Data acquisition Seven adult patients with stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT were identified for this study

  • The MRIW+B-based plan resulted in less than 3% V100% and V93% over-prediction for all patients, except for Patient 3 (Table 2) which had a substantial part of PTV70 close to the dental implants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The advent of conformal radiation therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has necessitated precise target delineation, allowing for improved local control by maximizing tumor dose while minimizing normal tissue exposure. Modern treatment planning software enables CT and MRI image fusion to utilize enhanced target delineation on MRI while retaining CT electron density information. This technique is the current gold standard for head and neck treatment planning when target delineation on MRI is desired, such as for tumors located at the base of skull.[3,4] MRI alone has yet to supplant CT for treatment planning, given limitations such as lack of electron density information, intrinsic image distortions,(6) and inability to image cortical bone and some high-density materials. Bulk density assignment on MRI for head and neck targets yields accurate dose calculation for 3D CRT planning,(15) but its impact on IMRT planning has not been fully elucidated. Other efforts have focused on developing MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time that can distinguish bone from air without CT data.[16,17]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.