Abstract

Headwaters can represent 80% of stream kilometers in a watershed, and they also have unique physical and biological properties that have only recently been recognized for their importance in sustaining healthy functioning stream networks and their ecological services. We sampled 60 headwater tributaries in the South Fork Trinity River, a 2,430 km2, mostly forested, multiple-use watershed in northwestern California. Our objectives were: (1) to differentiate unique headwater types using 69 abiotic and vegetation variables measured at three spatial scales, and then to reduce these to informative subsets; (2) determine if distinct biota occupied the different tributary types; (3) determine the environmental attributes associated with the presence and abundance of these biotic assemblages; and (4) using niche modeling, determine key attribute thresholds to illustrate how these biota could be employed as metrics of system integrity and ecological services. Several taxa were sufficiently abundant and widespread to use as bio-indicators: the presence and abundance of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), herpetofauna (reptile and amphibian) species richness, and signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) represented different trophic positions, value as commercial resources (steelhead), sensitivity to environmental stress (amphibians), and indicators of biodiversity (herpetofauna species richness). Herpetofauna species richness did not differ, but abundances of steelhead trout, signal crayfish, and amphibian richness all differed significantly among tributary types. Niche models indicated that distribution and abundance patterns in both riparian and aquatic environments were associated with physical and structural attributes at multiple spatial scales, both within and around reaches. The bio-indicators responded to unique sets of attributes, reflecting the high environmental heterogeneity in headwater tributaries across this large watershed. These niche attributes represented a wide range of headwater environments, indicating responses to a number of natural and anthropogenic conditions, and demonstrated the value of using a suite of bio-indicators to elucidate watershed conditions, and to examine numerous disturbances that may influence ecological integrity.

Highlights

  • Understanding ecosystem dynamics and cross–scale interactions (Peters et al, 2007) are challenging in dendritic riverine ecosystems where geomorphology, hydrology, and landscape processes influence biotic communities at multiple spatial and temporal scales (Ward, 1989, 1998; Wiens, 2002; Allan, 2004; Lowe et al, 2006)

  • Three climatic, three disturbance, and one geologic attribute differed among the reach groups at the sub–basin scale

  • The best model was that of geographic relationships; the climate model was second, and the disturbance regime model third. When these 12 variables were combined in a sub–basin scale discriminant analysis (DA), seven contributed to the composite model; four geographic, two climatic, and one geologic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding ecosystem dynamics and cross–scale interactions (Peters et al, 2007) are challenging in dendritic riverine ecosystems where geomorphology, hydrology, and landscape processes influence biotic communities at multiple spatial and temporal scales (Ward, 1989, 1998; Wiens, 2002; Allan, 2004; Lowe et al, 2006). There is a growing body of knowledge about watershed–scale processes and how they shape and influence ecosystem services (e.g., Naiman & Bilby, 1998; Fagan, 2002; Wiens, 2002; Allan, 2004). This knowledge can guide comparative studies and allows key principles of ecosystem processes to be uncovered (e.g., Grant et al, 2007). It can promote the development of management strategies designed to enhance and protect the functionality of these systems (Lowe et al, 2006). Eco systems that are managed sustainably will provide perpetual services without losing process elements and system integrity (Westra et al, 2000; Hooper et al, 2005; Karr, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.