Abstract

Beyond apparent simplicity, visuomotor dexterity actually requires the coordination of multiple interactions across a complex system that links the brain, the body and the environment. Recent research suggests that a better understanding of how perceptive, cognitive and motor activities cohere to form executive control could be gained from multifractal formalisms applied to movement behavior. Rather than a central executive “talking” to encapsuled components, the multifractal intuition suggests that eye-hand coordination arises from multiplicative cascade dynamics across temporal scales of activity within the whole system, which is reflected in movement time series. Here we examined hand movements of sport students performing a visuomotor task in virtual reality (VR). The task involved hitting spatially arranged targets that lit up on a virtual board under critical time pressure. Three conditions were compared where the visual search field changed: whole board (Standard), half-board lower view field (LVF) and upper view field (UVF). Densely sampled (90 Hz) time series of hand motions captured by VR controllers were analyzed by a focus-based multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Multiplicative rather than additive interactions across temporal scales were evidenced by testing comparatively phase-randomized surrogates of experimental series, which confirmed nonlinear processes. As main results, it was demonstrated that: (i) the degree of multifractality in hand motion behavior was minimal in LVF, a familiar visual search field where subjects correlatively reached their best visuomotor response times (RTs); (ii) multifractality increased in the less familiar UVF, but interestingly only for the non-dominant hand; and (iii) multifractality increased further in Standard, for both hands indifferently; in Standard, the maximal expansion of the visual search field imposed the highest demand as evidenced by the worst visuomotor RTs. Our observations advocate for visuomotor dexterity best described by multiplicative cascades dynamics and a system-wide distributed control rather than a central executive. More importantly, multifractal metrics obtained from hand movements behavior, beyond the confines of the brain, offer a window on the fine organization of control architecture, with high sensitivity to hand-related control behavior under specific constraints. Appealing applications may be found in movement learning/rehabilitation, e.g., in hemineglect people, stroke patients, maturing children or athletes.

Highlights

  • Nonlinear Movement CoordinationMost activities of daily human life depend on adequate physical interactions between the individual and its environment

  • The present study supports the intuition of interactiondominance in the system wide cognitive control of visuomotor dexterity

  • Beyond the observation that multiplicative cascade dynamics might represent a fundamental organization of cognitive movement control, multifractal roots showed tight links with adaptation, a critical property that is broadly associated to health

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most activities of daily human life depend on adequate physical interactions between the individual and its environment This way, the capacity to reach a target obviously represents a critical function of the movement system repertoire. Most of sensorimotor and cognitive systems have been extensively described through their independent components, explanations remain more elusive when it comes to consider their proper functioning as a whole, which, makes the essential phenomenon of adaptation difficult to grasp (Torre et al, 2019) To overcome this difficulty, a great deal of attention has been paid in recent years to the main characteristic of interdependencies within and between component activity in complex systems, governed by nonlinear processes, and spanning multiple and nested temporal and spatial scales. The multifractal formalism of human behavior has been a reliable and popular approach to focus on nonlinear interactions that shape adaptive system flexibility (Ihlen and Vereijken, 2013; Carver et al, 2017; Bell et al, 2019; Torre et al, 2019)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.