Abstract

Without imputing desirability or success, many scholars have come to take European fascism seriously as innovative, modern and even revolutionary. Doing so might seem to buttress long-standing ways of distinguishing genuine fascism, as manifested in Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, from contemporaneous regimes in Spain, Portugal, Austria and elsewhere that long seem to have exploited some of the trappings of fascism for merely authoritarian or reactionary purposes. These latter were ‘para-fascist’, in the termynology that Roger Griffin adopted 20 years ago, using ‘para’ in its dictionary sense as an alteration, perversion or simulation of the real thing.1

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.