Abstract
SummaryDisaster risk management (DRM) seeks to help societies prepare for, mitigate, or recover from the adverse impacts of disasters and climate change. Core to DRM are disaster risk models that rely heavily on geospatial data about the natural and built environments. Developers are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the quality of these models. Yet, there is still little understanding of how the extent of hidden geospatial biases affects disaster risk models and how accountability relationships are affected by these emerging actors and methods. In many cases, there is also a disconnect between the algorithm designers and the communities where the research is conducted or algorithms are implemented. This perspective highlights emerging concerns about the use of AI in DRM. We discuss potential concerns and illustrate what must be considered from a data science, ethical, and social perspective to ensure the responsible usage of AI in this field.
Highlights
Climate change and population growth in urban areas are increasing the risk of persons and infrastructure to disasters
Disaster risk management (DRM) has recognized the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to rapidly and accurately process data, and is using AI to develop more accurate risk models and prioritize the distribution of disaster aid.[4]
We emphasize the opportunities of turning researchers interested in FAccT and other ethical considerations of AI toward DRM and geospatial data
Summary
Disaster risk management (DRM) seeks to help societies prepare for, mitigate, or recover from the adverse impacts of disasters and climate change. Core to DRM are disaster risk models that rely heavily on geospatial data about the natural and built environments. There is still little understanding of how the extent of hidden geospatial biases affects disaster risk models and how accountability relationships are affected by these emerging actors and methods. There is a disconnect between the algorithm designers and the communities where the research is conducted or algorithms are implemented. This perspective highlights emerging concerns about the use of AI in DRM. We discuss potential concerns and illustrate what must be considered from a data science, ethical, and social perspective to ensure the responsible usage of AI in this field
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Disaster Risk Management
Geospatial Data
Bias In Algorithms
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Google Scholar
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Sep 1, 2022
Physica Medica
Mar 1, 2021
Cell
Jun 1, 2020
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Apr 1, 2021
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Oct 1, 2020
iGIE
Mar 1, 2023
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Aug 1, 2020
Patterns
Sep 1, 2021
Fertility and Sterility
Nov 1, 2020
The Lancet Digital Health
Jul 1, 2022
The Lancet Digital Health
Jul 1, 2020
Clinical Oncology
Feb 1, 2020
The Lancet Digital Health
Sep 1, 2021
Patterns
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023
Patterns
Nov 1, 2023