Abstract

We determine the evolution of the faint, high-redshift, optical luminosity function (LF) of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) implied by several observationally motivated models of the ionizing background from 3 < z < 5. Our results depend crucially on whether we use the total ionizing rate measured by the proximity effect technique or the lower determination favored by the flux decrement distribution of Lyα forest lines. Assuming a faint-end LF slope of 1.58 and the SDSS estimates of the bright-end slope and normalization, we find that the LF must break at M = -24.2, -22.3, -20.8 at z = 3, 4, 5 if we adopt the lower ionization rate and assume no stellar contribution to the background. The breaks must occur at M = -20.6, -18.7, -18.7 for the proximity effect estimate. Since stars may also contribute to the background, these values are lower limits on the break luminosity, and they brighten by as much as ~2 mag if the escape fraction of ionizing photons from high-z galaxies is consistent with recent estimates: fesc = 0.16. By comparing our expectations to faint AGN searches in the Hubble Deep Field and high-z galaxy fields, we find that typically quoted proximity effect estimates of the background imply an overabundance of AGNs compared to the faint counts (even with fesc = 1). Even adopting the lower bound on proximity effect measurements, the stellar escape fraction must be high: fesc 0.2. Conversely, the lower flux decrement-derived background requires a smaller number of ionizing sources, and faint AGN counts are consistent with this estimate only if there is a limited stellar contribution, fesc 0.05. Our derived LFs together with the locally estimated black hole density suggest that the efficiency of converting mass to light in optically unobscured AGNs is somewhat lower than expected, 0.05 (all models). Comparison with similar estimates based on X-ray counts suggests that more than half of all AGNs are obscured in the UV/optical. We also derive lower limits on typical AGN lifetimes and obtain 107 yr for favored cases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.