Abstract

Subjective patient satisfaction is the most relevant parameter for assessing the success of treatment after orthopaedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to correlate patient-reported outcome parameters (i.e., absolute KOOS, KOOS increase) and revision-free survival with patient’s satisfaction. Furthermore, the study aimed on the identification of pre-operative factors that are associated with patient’s satisfaction after the surgery.For the present study, 6305 consecutive patients from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) were analyzed. Patient characteristics and outcome were correlated with patients’ satisfaction after a follow-up of three years by Spearman correlation. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Mean age was 37 ± 12.5 years, 59.7% patients were male, and 40.3% female. Most patients (46.7%) were treated with an autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). The strongest correlation of subjective satisfaction and the subscore quality of life (r = 0.682; p < 0.001) was found, whereas the post-operative increase in KOOS from the pre-operative value showed only a moderate correlation (r = 0.520; p < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation with the absolute KOOS value (r = 0.678; p < 0.001), the subscores pain (r = 0.652; p < 0.001), quality of life (r = 0.682; p < 0.001), and sports (r = 0.633; p < 0.001), whereas symptoms (r = 0.504, p < 0.001) and activities of daily life (r = 0.601; p < 0.001) showed a weaker correlation. Pain also correlated highly significant with the patient satisfaction 24 months after surgery (r = − 0.651, p < 0.001). The correlation between satisfaction after the 2nd and 3rd year (r = 0.727; p < 0.001) is stronger than correlation after six months and three years (r = 0.422, p < 0.001). All pre-operative parameters show a very weak correlation (r < 0.1).The use of standardized measuring instruments (KOOS and Pain) is a relevant outcome parameter in science and clinical practice, whereas absolute values represent satisfaction better than the individual increase. The subscores “pain,” “quality of life,” and “sports” represent satisfaction better than the subscores “symptoms” and “activity of daily life.” Early satisfaction has only a moderate predictive value for satisfaction after 3 years, which is of great practical relevance in particular for the assessment of potential treatment failures. It is remarkable to note that a revision surgery is only very mildly associated with increased dissatisfaction. Pre-operative factors are not reliable prediction factors for post-operative patient satisfaction.

Highlights

  • Most research in orthopedic surgery is measuring outcome after certain therapies by functional outcome scores such as KOOS (Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), or Tegner score [1,2,3,4]

  • The KnorpelRegister DGOU is an observational, nation-wide, and longitudinal multi-centre registry of patients assigned for surgical treatment for cartilage defects of the knee and aims to determine real-life treatment patterns and clinical outcomes

  • In 46.7% of the cases, the defects were treated by autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), followed by 14.6% with bone marrow stimulating techniques (BMS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most research in orthopedic surgery is measuring outcome after certain therapies by functional outcome scores such as KOOS (Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), or Tegner score [1,2,3,4]. Patients’ satisfaction received increasing interest to broaden the understanding of the relationships between clinical results and to reevaluate established procedures to clarify their value to the patients [5]. This trend to analyze patients’ satisfaction is visible during recent years [6,7,8,9], but reporting on satisfaction is still not broadly established—in a systematic review by Makhni et al, it could be shown that only 30% of the studies are reporting on outcome after cartilage repair by analyzing patients’ satisfaction [10]. The aim of the underlying analysis was to investigate which factors correlate most with the satisfaction reported by the patients undergoing cartilage repair in a cohort of 4986 patients and if the outcome measures we are using are eligible to report on the treatments’ success to the full extent

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.