Abstract

BackgroundPatient recruitment to clinical research is often challenging and, when inadequate, can result in delayed or underpowered studies. Recruitment problems were experienced during a study of women with heavy menstrual bleeding in general practice (the MIRA trial). Although efforts were made to reduce the burden of the study for those participating, patient recruitment was still an issue.AimTo identify the barriers and facilitators associated with patient recruitment to clinical trials, as experienced by GPs.Design & settingA qualitative study was performed in Dutch general practice, using semi-structured interviews.MethodGPs participating in the MIRA trial were selected by purposive sampling and interviewed until saturation was reached. Three independent researchers performed data coding and thematic analysis. Consensus on the identified themes was reached by discussion among the researchers.ResultsSixteen GPs were interviewed. The following factors were noted to influence recruitment: the incidence of the disease under study; awareness of the study; attitude towards scientific research; perceived burden for the patient; usual care by the GP; time investment; characteristics of the GP and their practice; and patient experience of research participation.ConclusionThe identified barriers and facilitators associated with patient recruitment highlight the areas in which future studies can be improved. Indeed, benefits could be gained by simply ensuring that study procedures are clear, by requiring limited (time) investment from the GP, and by investing in personal communication and reminders to keep the GP motivated and interested. Placing greater importance on scientific research during the GP training programme could also serve as a means to motivate future GPs to integrate scientific research in their clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are a powerful research tool that can minimise bias when evaluating health interventions and help to deliver evidence that is of high quality.[1]

  • The identified barriers and facilitators associated with patient recruitment highlight the areas in which future studies can be improved

  • Benefits could be gained by ensuring that study procedures are clear, by requiring limited investment from the GP, and by investing in personal communication and reminders to keep the GP motivated and interested

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are a powerful research tool that can minimise bias when evaluating health interventions and help to deliver evidence that is of high quality.[1]. Studies recruiting incident cases face larger problems with patient recruitment than studies identifying cases via GP registration systems (prevalent cases).[4] The inclusion of incident cases requires that GPs are alert to patient recruitment during consultation hours, which can prove challenging. Studies on this topic have reported large variations in GP recruitment of patients. Efforts were made to reduce the burden of the study for those participating, patient recruitment was still an issue

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.