Abstract

Spatial models of density and abundance are widely used in both ecological research (e.g., to study habitat use) and wildlife management (e.g., for population monitoring and environmental impact assessment). Increasingly, modellers are tasked with integrating data from multiple sources, collected via different observation processes. Distance sampling is an efficient and widely used survey and analysis technique. Within this framework, observation processes are modelled via detection functions. We seek to take multiple data sources and fit them in a single spatial model. Density surface models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach: first accounting for detectability via distance sampling methods, then modelling distribution via a generalized additive model. However, current software and theory does not address the issue of multiple data sources. We extend the DSM approach to accommodate data from multiple surveys, collected via conventional distance sampling, double-observer distance sampling (used to account for incomplete detection at zero distance) and strip transects. Variance propagation ensures that uncertainty is correctly accounted for in final estimates of abundance. Methods described here are implemented in the dsm R package. We briefly analyse two datasets to illustrate these new developments. Our new methodology enables data from multiple distance sampling surveys of different types to be treated in a single spatial model, enabling more robust abundance estimation, potentially over wider geographical or temporal domains.

Highlights

  • As ecological data are amassed over time, the job of the modeller becomes increasingly difficult

  • In this paper we attempt to address this problem for the case of spatially-explicit abundance estimation from distance sampling data

  • Density surface models (DSMs) are most often applied to data from a single survey with a single detection function, sometimes using one or more covariates to model variation in detectability (multiple covariate distance sampling, MCDS; Marques & Buckland (2004)). We extend these models to the case where we have detection functions that account for missing observations at zero distance (mark-recapture distance sampling, MRDS; Burt et al (2014)) and where it is necessary or desirable to integrate data from multiple surveys into one model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As ecological data are amassed over time, the job of the modeller becomes increasingly difficult. In this paper we attempt to address this problem for the case of spatially-explicit abundance estimation from distance sampling data. Distance sampling-based techniques (Buckland et al, 2001) are extremely popular ways of estimating abundance or density of biological populations. Methods have been developed to incorporate spatial information (e.g., environmental covariates) (Hedley & Buckland, 2004; Johnson, Laake & Ver Hoef, 2010; Yuan et al, 2017), moving towards model-based, spatially-explicit abundance estimates. One approach is density surface modelling (DSMs; Hedley & Buckland, 2004; Miller et al, 2013), which combine detectability information using standard distance sampling methods with a spatial model using the generalized additive modelling framework (Wood, 2017). DSMs have been used to obtain abundance estimates for populations where the individuals are not uniformly distributed over the study area (Harihar, Pandav & MacMillan, 2014), to inform spatial planning in impact assessments (Winiarski et al, 2014, 2013) and to mitigate negative impacts of military operations (Roberts et al, 2016)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.