Abstract
Conventional Geographical Information Systems (GIS) software struggles to represent uncertain and contested historical knowledge. An ontology, meaning a semantic structure defining named entities, and explicit and typed relationships, can be constructed in the absence of locational data, and spatial objects can be attached to this structure if and when they become available. We describe the overall architecture of the Great Britain Historical GIS, and the PastPlace Administrative Unit Ontology that forms its core. Then, we show how particular historical geographies can be represented within this architecture through two case studies, both emphasizing entity definition and especially the application of a multi-level typology, in which each “unit” has an unchanging “type” but also a time-variant “status”. The first includes the linked systems of Poor Law unions and registration districts in 19th century England and Wales, in which most but not all unions and districts were coterminous. The second case study includes the international system of nation-states, in which most units do not appear from nothing, but rather gain or lose independence. We show that a relatively simple data model is able to represent much historical complexity.
Highlights
History is concerned not just with the past but with the interpretation of documentary sources, distinguishing it from archaeology
Applying Geographical Information Systems-based methods historically generally requires the construction of knowledge bases enabling the translation of toponyms, as they appear in historical documents, into geographical coordinates
One problem is that toponyms rarely work as unique identifiers, so a particular name may refer to many different locations, and a particular location will commonly have multiple names, sometimes in multiple languages and changing in importance over time
Summary
History is concerned not just with the past but with the interpretation of documentary sources, distinguishing it from archaeology. This paper is concerned mainly with administrative areas, or ‘units’ that we generally assume to have had precise, legally defined boundaries; representing historical units within a GIS faces a series of challenges.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.