Exploring Use of Digital Health Technologies, Digital Health Care Literacy, and Attitudes Toward Digital Health Among Norwegian Health Care Personnel Involved in Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care: Cross-Sectional Study.

BackgroundA rapidly aging population, a shifting disease burden and the ongoing threat of infectious disease outbreaks pose major concerns for Vietnam’s health care system. Health disparities are evident in many parts of the country, especially in rural areas, and the population faces inequitable access to patient-centered health care. Vietnam must therefore explore and implement advanced solutions to the provision of patient-centered care, with a view to reducing pressures on the health care system simultaneously. The use of digital health technologies (DHTs) may be one of these solutions.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the application of DHTs to support the provision of patient-centered care in low- and middle-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region (APR) and to draw lessons for Vietnam.MethodsA scoping review was undertaken. Systematic searches of 7 databases were conducted in January 2022 to identify publications on DHTs and patient-centered care in the APR. Thematic analysis was conducted, and DHTs were classified using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence evidence standards framework for DHTs (tiers A, B, and C). Reporting was in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.ResultsOf the 264 publications identified, 45 (17%) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the DHTs were classified as tier C (15/33, 45%), followed by tier B (14/33, 42%) and tier A (4/33, 12%). At an individual level, DHTs increased accessibility of health care and health-related information, supported individuals in self-management, and led to improvements in clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. At a systems level, DHTs supported patient-centered outcomes by increasing efficiency, reducing strain on health care resources, and supporting patient-centered clinical practice. The most frequently reported enablers for the use of DHTs for patient-centered care included alignment of DHTs with users’ individual needs, ease of use, availability of direct support from health care professionals, provision of technical support as well as user education and training, appropriate governance of privacy and security, and cross-sectorial collaboration. Common barriers included low user literacy and digital literacy, limited user access to DHT infrastructure, and a lack of policies and protocols to guide the implementation and use of DHTs.ConclusionsThe use of DHTs is a viable option to increase equitable access to quality, patient-centered care across Vietnam and simultaneously reduce pressures on the health care system. Vietnam can take advantage of the lessons learned by other low- and middle-income countries in the APR when developing a national road map to digital health transformation. Recommendations that Vietnamese policy makers may consider include emphasizing stakeholder engagement, strengthening digital literacy, supporting the improvement of DHT infrastructure, increasing cross-sectorial collaboration, strengthening governance of cybersecurity, and leading the way in DHT uptake.

The use of digital technologies within health care rapidly increased as services transferred to web-based platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequalities in digital health across the domains of equity are not routinely examined; yet, the long-term integration of digitally delivered services needs to consider such inequalities to ensure equitable benefits. This scoping review aimed to map inequities in access, use, and engagement with digital health technologies across equity domains. We searched 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, ASSIA, PsycINFO, and Scopus) for quantitative and mixed methods reviews and meta-analyses published between January 2016 and May 2022. Reviews were limited to those that included studies from the World Health Organization's European region. Extracted data were mapped against Cochrane's PROGRESS PLUS (place of residence, race, ethnicity, culture, and language, occupation, gender and sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, social capital, and other characteristics) dimensions of equity. In total, 404 unique citations were identified from the searches, and 2 citations were identified from other sources. After eligibility assessment, 22 reviews were included. Consistent evidence was found showing higher access to digital health technologies among patients who were of White ethnicity, were English speaking, and had no disability. There were no reviews that explored differences in access to digital health care by age, gender and sex, occupation, education, or homeless or substance misuse. Higher use of digital health technologies was observed among populations that were White, English speaking, younger, with a higher level of education, of higher economic status, and residents in urban areas. No clear evidence of differences in the use of digital technologies by occupation, gender and sex, disability, or homeless or substance misuse was found, nor was clear evidence found in the included reviews on inequalities in the engagement with digital technologies. Finally, no reviews were identified that explored differences by place of residence. Despite awareness of the potential impact of inequalities in digital health, there are important evidence gaps across multiple equity domains. The development of a common framework for evaluating digital health equity in new health initiatives and consistency in reporting findings is needed.

Even though Germany is an industrialised country, health inequalities exist between individuals or population groups due to unequal access to scarce social resources such as money or knowledge. This case study illustrates the extent of the digital divide in access and use of digital health technologies. Data from the Liter@te study, in which 96 adults aged 18-64 years with low reading and writing skills living in Germany were asked about their digital health technology use and their digital health literacy, were compared with two parallel conducted population surveys in Germany (i.e., nationwide telephone survey on digitalisation and health with 1020 internet users aged 18 years and above, online survey on digitalisation in health care with 1839 adults aged 18-80 years insured at a statutory health insurance company). Adults with low reading and writing skills used digital devices in the health context such as computers (23% vs. 71%) or activity trackers (21% vs. 35%) less frequently than the general population, whereas no differences were reported in the use of smartphones (79% vs. 70%). In addition, 18% of adults with low reading and writing skills and 4% of the general population stated that they do not use digital health technologies. Other digital health technologies such as online appointment scheduling (25% vs. 81%) or health websites (32% vs. 45%) were also used less frequently by adults with low reading and writing skills compared to the general population. Participants in the Liter@te study who do not use digital health technologies reported more frequent access problems (e.g., no suitable device, technical problems, poor internet connection) than participants in the population survey. 35% of participants in the Liter@te study have a low digital health literacy (eHEALS score between 8-19/40 points), compared to only 8% in the population survey.

Digital health interventions for COVID-19 in China: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundDespite the benefits of digital health technology use, older adults with cancer (ie, aged 65 years) have reported challenges to technology adoption. However, there has been a lack of a good understanding of their digital health technology use patterns and the associated influential factors in the past few years.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the trends in and factors associated with digital health technology use among older adults with cancer.MethodsThe National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) data set is a national longitudinal cohort study with annual survey waves of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Participants were community-dwelling older adults who self-reported previous or current cancer diagnoses in each round. The study sample size of each round ranged from 1996 (2015) to 1131 (2021). Digital health technology use was defined as using the internet or online in the last month to order or refill prescriptions, contact medical providers, handle Medicare or other insurance matters, or get information about their health conditions. The association of sociodemographics, clinical factors (self-rated health, chronic conditions, difficulties in activities of daily living, dementia, anxiety, and depression), and physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery and grip strength) with digital health technology use was examined using design-based logistic regression. All statistical analyses accounted for the complex sample design.ResultsThe prevalence of any digital health technology use increased from 36% in 2015 to 45% in 2019. In 2020-2021, which was amid the COVID-19 pandemic, it ranged from 51% to 52%. In terms of each digital health technology use behavior, in 2015, overall, 28% of older cancer survivors used digital health technology to obtain health information, followed by contacting clinicians (19%), filling prescriptions (14%), and handling insurance (11%). Greater use of digital health technology was associated with younger age, being White, having a college or higher education, having a higher income, having more comorbidities, nondementia, and having a higher gait speed.ConclusionsDigital health technology use in older adults with cancer has gradually increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, socioeconomic and racial disparities have remained in older cancer survivors. Additionally, older adults with cancer may have some unique features associated with digital health technology use; for example, their use of digital health may be increased by their comorbidities (ie, health care needs) and reduced by their frailty.

BackgroundDigital health literacy is a key factor in enabling users to navigate in an increasingly digitalized health care system. Low levels of digital health literacy are associated with higher age, low education, and income, as well as low functional health literacy. Around 6.2 million adults living in Germany have low reading and writing skills. Due to their low literacy, this group is often underrepresented in research studies and therefore little is known about their digital health literacy and use of digital health tools.ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess digital health literacy in adults with low reading and writing skills and to explore which digital health tools they use in daily life.MethodsAn interviewer-administered survey and focus groups were conducted with adult residents of Bremen, Germany, who were aged 18‐64 years and had low reading and writing skills. In addition, a stakeholder workshop was held to derive recommendations on how digital health literacy could be improved. The survey questionnaire included 21 items addressing the use of digital health technologies and digital health literacy (eHealth Literacy Scale). Focus group participants completed several tasks on web-based health information and then discussed their experiences. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regression. Qualitative content analysis was applied to analyze the focus group data and the written documentation of the stakeholder workshop.ResultsSurvey participants (n=96) were on average 43 (SD 10.7) years old, 72% (69/96) were female, and 92% (88/96) were not born in Germany. Participants reported mainly using information-related digital health technologies such as health apps (40/96, 42%), health websites (30/96, 31%), or activity trackers (27/96, 28%). The mean digital health literacy score was 22 (SD 8) points, with 35% (34/96) of participants classified as having a low digital health literacy (score between 8-19/40 points). Digital health technology use was associated with higher digital health literacy. For participants in the 5 focus groups (total n=39; mean age 43, SD 12.6 years; n=34, 87% female), limited technical skills and language problems were the most important challenges. Furthermore, focus group participants reported that they favor videos when searching for web-based health information and prefer to seek support from family members or local organizations for health issues. Stakeholders (n=15) recommended that health websites should be available in multiple languages, contain simple and easy-to-read language, and use images, symbols, and videos.ConclusionsWhile adults with low reading and writing skills use digital health technologies, many find it challenging to search for health information on the internet due to lacking technical skills and language problems. To ensure that adults with low reading and writing skills are not further left behind, future research should focus on developing tailored interventions to promote digital health literacy.

Digital health technologies can potentially reduce health disparities in cancer care. However, the benefits of digital health technology depend partly on users' digital health literacy, that is, "capabilities and resources required for individuals to use and benefit from digital health resources," which combines health and digital literacy. We examined issues for digital health technology implementation in cancer care regarding digital health literacy, via stakeholder consultation. Consumers, health care professionals, researchers, developers, nongovernment and government/policy stakeholders (N=51) participated in focus groups/interviews discussing barriers, enablers, needs and opportunities for digital health implementation in cancer care. Researchers applied framework analysis to identify themes of digital health literacy in the context of disparity and inclusion. Limited digital and traditional health literacy were identified as barriers to digital technology engagement, with a range of difficulties identified for older, younger and socio-economically or geographically disadvantaged groups. Digital health technology was a potential enabler of health care access and literacy, affording opportunities to increase reach and engagement. Education combined with targeted design and implementation were identified means of addressing health and digital literacy to effectively implement digital health in cancer care. Implementing digital health in cancer care must address the variability of digital health literacy in recipients, including groups living with disadvantage and older and younger people, in order to be effective. SO WHAT?: If cancer outcome disparity is to be reduced via digital health technologies, they must be implemented strategically to address digital health literacy needs. Health policy should reflect this approach.

BackgroundHealth systems are increasingly looking toward the private sector to provide digital solutions to address health care demands. Innovation in digital health is largely driven by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), yet these companies experience significant barriers to entry, especially in public health systems. Complex and fragmented care models, alongside a myriad of relevant stakeholders (eg, purchasers, providers, and producers of health care products), make developing value propositions for digital solutions highly challenging.ObjectiveThis study aims to identify areas for health system improvement to promote the integration of innovative digital health technologies developed by SMEs.MethodsThis paper qualitatively analyzes a series of case studies to identify health system barriers faced by SMEs developing digital health technologies in Canada and proposed solutions to encourage a more innovative ecosystem. The Women’s College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care established a consultation program for SMEs to help them increase their innovation capacity and take their ideas to market. The consultation involved the SME filling out an onboarding form and review of this information by an expert advisory committee using guided considerations, leading to a recommendation report provided to the SME. This paper reports on the characteristics of 25 SMEs who completed the program and qualitatively analyzed their recommendation reports to identify common barriers to digital health innovation.ResultsA total of 2 central themes were identified, each with 3 subthemes. First, a common barrier to system integration was the lack of formal evaluation, with SMEs having limited resources and opportunities to conduct such an evaluation. Second, the health system’s current structure does not create incentives for clinicians to use digital technologies, which threatens the sustainability of SMEs’ business models. SMEs faced significant challenges in engaging users and payers from the public system due to perverse economic incentives. Physicians are compensated by in-person visits, which actively works against the goals of many digital health solutions of keeping patients out of clinics and hospitals.ConclusionsThere is a significant disconnect between the economic incentives that drive clinical behaviors and the use of digital technologies that would benefit patients’ well-being. To encourage the use of digital health technologies, publicly funded health systems need to dedicate funding for the evaluation of digital solutions and streamlined pathways for clinical integration.

Digital technologies have become more important in the health care sector in the past decades. This transition from conventional to digital health care has been accelerated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which poses the risk of creating a "digital divide," inadvertently placing those who are older, economically disadvantaged, and have a lower level of education at a disadvantage. This study focuses on the influence of socioeconomic factors on the adoption of digital health technology in the Frisian population and how this relation is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2019 and 2020, a panel study was conducted on digital health in the Frisian population in the Netherlands. In the survey, the use of digital health technology was operationalized in a broad sense, going beyond the care context by also including preventative health-promoting solutions generally available on the consumer market, such as wearables and lifestyle apps. First, to assess the influence of socioeconomic factors on the total use of digital health apps, a generalized linear model was fitted with use of digital health app as the dependent variable and socioeconomic factors as between-subject factors on the 2019 data. Second, to analyze whether the use of separate health apps increased from 2019 to 2020, we conducted chi-square tests on different digital health app types. Third, to examine the influence of COVID-19 on the use of digital health apps, a generalized linear mixed model was fitted with the use of digital health apps as the dependent variable, COVID-19 as the within-subject variable, and socioeconomic factors as between-subject factors. The results indicated that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, digital health technology use was higher in women, younger people, and those who are well educated and economically more privileged. Moreover, the percentage of people who reported using digital health technology rose from 70% (1580/2258) to 82.5% (1812/2197) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was significant for all separate types of digital health technology (all P<.001). In addition, we found the interaction effects of COVID-19 with age and education attainment, indicating that the lower total use among older people and people with lower education attainment became slightly less apparent from 2019 to 2020. These findings on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital divide indicated that the use of all types of digital health apps increased and that older individuals and people with a lower level of education caught up a little during COVID-19. Future research should gain more insight into this effect and examine whether it persists beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, future endeavors should focus on vulnerable groups, ensuring they receive adequate attention to guarantee access to health care, preventative health-promoting solutions, and social services.

Digital health technologies and health-care privatisation

Compassionate nursing care and the use of digital health technologies: A scoping review

BackgroundDigital health technologies are increasingly used by healthcare professionals working in pediatric hospital and rehabilitation settings. Multiple factors may affect the implementation and use of digital health technologies in these settings. However, such factors have not been identified in a multidisciplinary, pediatric context. The objective of this study was to describe actual use and to identify the factors that promote or hinder the intention to use digital health technologies (mobile learning applications, virtual/augmented reality, serious games, robotic devices, telehealth applications, computerized assessment tools, and wearables) among pediatric healthcare professionals.MethodsAn online survey evaluating opinions, current use, and future intentions to use digital health technologies was completed by 108 professionals at one of Canada’s largest pediatric institutes. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the attitudes of healthcare professionals who intend to increase their use of digital health technologies and those who do not. Linear regression analyses were used to determine predictors of usage success.ResultsHealthcare professionals reported mostly using mobile and tablet learning applications (n = 43, 38.1%), telehealth applications (n = 49, 43.4%), and computerized assessment tools (n = 33, 29.2%). Attitudes promoting the intention to increase the use of digital health technologies varied according to technology type. Healthcare professionals who wished to increase their use of digital health technologies reported a more positive attitude regarding benefits in clinical practice and patient care, but were also more critical of potential negative impacts on patient-professional relationships. Ease of use (β = 0.374; p = 0.020) was a significant predictor of more favorable usage success. The range of obstacles encountered was also a significant predictor (β = 0.342; p = 0.032) of less favorable evaluation of usage success. Specific factors that hinder successful usage are lack of training (β = 0.303; p = 0.033) and inadequate infrastructure (β = 0.342; p = 0.032).ConclusionsWhen working with children, incorporating digital health technologies can be effective for motivation and adherence. However, it is crucial to ensure these tools are implemented properly. The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing training and infrastructure needs when elaborating technology-specific strategies for multidisciplinary adoption of digital health technologies in pediatric settings.

ObjectiveA digital divide exists for people from rural and regional areas where they are less likely and confident to engage in digital health technologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the digital health literacy and engagement of people from rural and regional communities, with a focus on identifying barriers and facilitators to using technology.ResultsForty adults living in rural/regional areas completed a survey consisting of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) with additional items surveying participants’ experience with a range of digital health technologies. All participants had used at least one digital health technology. Most (80%) participants had an eHEALS score of 26 or above indicating confidence in online health information. Commonly reported barriers to digital health technology use centred on product complexity and reliability, awareness of resources, lack of trust, and cost. Effective digital health technology use is becoming increasingly important, there may be a need to prioritise and support people with lower levels of digital health literacy. We present opportunities to support community members in using and accessing digital health technology.

Background Around 12% of the adult population living in Germany have low reading and writing skills. Little is known about their digital health literacy and use of digital health technologies. The objectives of the Liter@te study were to assess the digital health literacy of adults with low reading and writing skills and to explore which digital tools they used in everyday life. Methods A cross-sectional survey (n = 96) and five focus groups (n = 39) were conducted with adults aged 18-64 years with low reading and writing skills. Digital health literacy was measured using the eHEALS scale and compared with results from a nationwide sample. Focus group participants completed a task course on digital health information and then discussed their experiences. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Qualitative content analysis was applied to analyze the focus group data. Results Survey participants were on average 44 years old, 72% were female and 92% were not born in Germany. Compared to the nationwide survey, use of digital health technologies and digital health literacy were lower. In addition, use of digital health technologies was associated with higher digital health literacy. Lack of technical skills, language problems, and searching and finding health information online were most challenging for focus group participants (mean age 43 years, 87% female). Focus group participants reported that they prefer videos when searching for health information online and seek support from family members or local organizations if they cannot find a solution to their health issue. Conclusions Adults with low reading and writing skills search for health information online, but have difficulties to find the appropriate information. Interventions to promote digital health literacy are needed to ensure that persons with low reading and writing skills are not further left behind. Key messages • Adults with low language skills have a low digital health literacy. • Reading and writing requirements and lack of technical skills make it difficult for them to search health information online.

Introduction: Digital health literacy is an individual's ability to search, understand, and evaluate health information on digital media. There is huge gap in digital health literacy which is rising to create digital gap in context of Nepal which prevents everyone to experiences the advantages of digital health. This study aimed to assess health professionals’ digital health literacy level, attitude towards use of digital health technology and associated factors in two municipalities of Lalitpur district. Method: A Cross-sectional study with a concurrent triangulation mixed-method design was used among thirty-four health professionals working in primary level health facilities in Lalitpur metropolitan and Mahalaxmi municipality. The duration of study was five weeks (September to October 2023). Variables such as age, education, job type were observed. Bivariate association with chi-square test was done for analysis and identified its associated factor while thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. Result: This study found 24(70.59%) health workers had high digital health literacy while 23(67.65%) had good attitude. Factors such as marital status, job designation, and family monthly income found to be statistically significant with digital health literacy and Job designation, patient served per day, income and access to digital technology were significant with attitude. While triangulating variables such as income and access to digital technology identified as convergent and training, age and education was found to be divergent. Conclusion: Digital health literacy was significantly influenced by technology and recommended to make computers more accessible, offer a training program and encourage a positive attitude toward this technology.