Abstract

Establishing protected areas is a predominant wildlife conservation effort across Africa. Such strategy, however, has inevitable social and economic impacts to the local people. Social impacts and conservation require equal attention because it is the foundations for alliances with social groups to address common concerns. This makes social impact assessment a very crucial tool to understand the long run impacts of wildlife conservation on local people. Surprisingly, such analysis is insufficient and seemingly uncommon practices in Ethiopia. This short review examines scarcely available literatures on these matters and suggests the ways to maximize the positive and minimize the negative impacts of the sector. It is hard to understand the policies and positions of conservation sectors of Ethiopia on social impacts of conservation. Positive social impacts of conservation range from employment opportunities, improved infrastructural development to monetary gains. Negative social impacts include human displacement, lack of resource access, conflicts arising from enforcement activities, and human-wildlife conflicts. Several studies from different parts of Ethiopia have indicated the alienation of the local community and their subsequent antagonistic responses towards conservation efforts. Integrating conservation programs and local community minimizes the costs and increases the benefits of the local people. These in turn raise the social acceptance and success of the program. Wildlife conservation in Ethiopia still requires a detailed studies and practical improvements to equally address the social and biological needs of the sector. Keywords: Costs of wildlife conservation, Ethiopia, Human displacement, Human-wildlife conflicts, Local community, Wildlife conservation DOI : 10.7176/JRDM/61-03 Publication date: November 30 th 2019

Highlights

  • Africans have experienced pre-colonial and post-colonial historical chapters of wildlife conservation (Ngoka and Lameed, 2012)

  • Conservation activity should, at the very least, do no harm, and where possible should contribute to the livelihoods of local community (CBD, 2008)

  • The purpose of this paper is to review the social impacts of wildlife conservation in Ethiopia, and how they are addressed for the betterment of the practice from both conservationists and local people perspectives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Africans have experienced pre-colonial and post-colonial historical chapters of wildlife conservation (Ngoka and Lameed, 2012). Traditional wildlife resource utilization and management systems characterize the pre-colonial wildlife conservation (Roe et al 2009). These systems have been abandoned and replaced by the idea of protected areas (PAs) during colonization, and retained even after independence (Haule et al 2002; Kipkeu et al 2014; Kinzig and McShane, 2015). The spatial strategy of setting aside PAs for wildlife conservation has unavoidable social and economic impacts (Adams and Hutton, 2007). Concerns about social impacts of conservation are not resolved and in some respects are increasing (Springer, 2009)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.