Abstract
There are varying opinions about family-witnessed resuscitation in children and young people throughout the literature and the guidance on this practice is outdated and imprecise. Family-witnessed resuscitation can have psychological benefits for relatives; however, healthcare practitioners are often prevented from implementing this practice because of the perceived negative effect on their work through distraction or interference. Healthcare practitioners can also find it challenging to negotiate the ethics of family-witnessed resuscitation, particularly in relation to whether this practice can be considered caring or compassionate. The limited guidance on family-witnessed resuscitation in children and young people also means that it can be challenging for healthcare practitioners who want to implement the practice to identify available evidence to justify their actions. This article explores the evidence for and against the practice of family-witnessed resuscitation in children and young people and provides recommendations for healthcare practitioners who are implementing this practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
