Exploring the frontier of oral nanomedicine in colorectal cancer therapy: Folate-targeted 5FU-Nisin-Selenium conjugates and probiotic-rich diets as a novel approach
Exploring the frontier of oral nanomedicine in colorectal cancer therapy: Folate-targeted 5FU-Nisin-Selenium conjugates and probiotic-rich diets as a novel approach
- Research Article
10
- 10.1007/s00280-007-0573-x
- Sep 5, 2007
- Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
The past years' therapy for colorectal cancer has evolved rapidly with the introduction of novel cytotoxic agents such as irinotecan, capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Further advances have been achieved with the integration of targeted agents such as bevacizumab, cetuximab and recently, panitumumab. As a result, third-line treatment is now a necessary step in the optimal treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). We conducted a literature review of English language publications on third-line therapy for MCRC from January 2000 to April 2007. Data on median overall survival (mOS), median time to progression (mTTP) and response rate were recorded. We found 27 articles and 22 abstracts to fulfil the criteria. Patients who received regimens containing oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrated mTTP up to 7 months and a mOS of 16 months. With irinotecan and 5-FU, mOS around 8 months were reported and with cetuximab combined with irinotecan, the highest mOS was 9.8 months. Third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer may improve mOS for patients with MCRC. Therefore, randomized studies should be conducted in the future.
- Research Article
58
- 10.1007/s10434-001-0044-2
- Jan 1, 2001
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
Little information is available on the impact that therapies used in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) have on long-term, health-related quality of life (HRQL). Knowledge of how HRQL is affected by these therapies is essential in properly selecting patients for treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term impact that surgical and adjuvant therapy for resectable CRC has on patient-reported HRQL in a male veteran population through a case-control design. All participating patients had completed therapy at least 6 months before enrollment. One hundred fifty-eight patients were accrued over a 3-year period (January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999) at a single institution. The impact of CRC surgery on HRQL was measured by comparing a cohort of 61 patients undergoing surgery alone for the treatment of CRC (CRC-S group) with 44 patients undergoing surgery for benign colonic disease (BCD group). To study the effect of adjuvant therapy for CRC on HRQL, a third cohort of 53 patients undergoing both surgical and adjuvant treatment (CRC-S/A group) was compared with the CRC-S group. For each group, health status was measured by a health survey questionnaire, SHORT FORM 36 (SF36). For patients treated for CRC, an additional disease-specific supplemental questionnaire also was used. Self-reported health status, as measured by mean SF36 score, was significantly reduced for the BCD group compared with CRC-S patients on general health perception (41.9 +/- 3.9 vs. 52.2 +/- 3.0, P = .04) and the standardized physical component score (31.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 37.5 +/- 1.5, P < .005). Despite an increased number of distally located tumors, later stage cancers, and an increased number of recurrences in the CRC-S/A group compared with the CRC-S cohort, no significant differences were identified between these groups on any of the subscales or standardized scores of SF36. Using the supplemental questions, no differences were identified between the CRC groups with respect to appetite, weight, or gastrointestinal or urinary functioning. Surgical therapy for CRC probably has minimal impact on long-term HRQL when compared with surgery for benign colonic processes. Similarly, there does not appear to be a measurable, lasting impact of CRC adjuvant therapy on HRQL when compared with surgery alone. Although overall impact of therapies for CRC on HRQL appears to be limited, measurement of therapeutic influence on an individual level and identification of selection criteria based on estimated impact on HRQL for these therapies requires prospective validation.
- Research Article
- 10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-5694
- Apr 21, 2025
- Cancer Research
Background/Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States and is associated with poor outcomes. NAD(P)H: Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), an enzyme, shown to contribute to chemoprotection for CRC. This meta-analysis aims to examine the association between NQO1 C609T polymorphisms and CRC risk. Furthermore, the study explores the binding capacity and efficacy of BBI 608 against NQO1 in CRC through molecular docking. The inhibitor will then be tested in vitro. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used in bibliographic searches. For the NQO1 C609T analysis, 18 studies were used. Data was gathered and subsequently calculated using the pooled odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, CI). Molecular docking, Western Blot, and QRT-PCR were used to determine the molecular function of BBI 608 and NQO1. Results: The relation between NQO1 polymorphism and CRC risk (TT + CT vs. CC: OR=1.19, 95% CI =1.06-1.34, p&lt;0.001) was significant. Furthermore, stratified investigation based on ethnicity indicated a significant association between NQO1 polymorphism and CRC risk (TT + CT vs. CC: OR=1.17, 95% CI =1.08-1.27, p&lt;0.001). This study indicates that the C609T polymorphism of NQO1 is linked with CRC risk in Asians and Caucasians. Computational approaches were applied to observe the molecular properties of BBI 608 (NQO1 inhibitor) and analyze the exact mechanism of NQO1 on CRC. This investigation provides a detailed understanding of the interaction between NQO1 and BBI 608 and its implication in CRC therapy. In vitro studies were performed to support this computational analysis. BBI 608 creates higher cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner in CRC cell lines. BBI 608 treatment significantly (p&lt;0.001) reduced the NQO1 expression at protein and RNA levels in both CRC (HCT 116 and RKO) cell lines. Conclusion: Based on meta-analysis and a computational approach, NQO1 is a viable biomarker and a possible molecular target in CRC. In vitro, results showed that inhibiting NQO1 by BBI 608 decreased cell proliferation in both CRC cell lines. Knockout, overexpression, or site-directed mutagenesis is essential for a better understanding of BBI 608-targeted NQO1 and its amino acids. Citation Format: Chaithanya Ganji, Santosh Behera, Lakkakula V. Bhaskar, Mehmet Akce, Bassel F. El-Rayes. Targeting NAD(P)H: Quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) for colorectal cancer diagnosis and therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5666.
- Research Article
2
- 10.2174/0115680096270555231113074003
- Jun 1, 2024
- Current cancer drug targets
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer types worldwide. Since colorectal cancer takes time to develop, its incidence and mortality can be treated effectively if it is detected in its early stages. As a result, non-invasive or invasive biomarkers play an essential role in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Many experimental studies have been carried out to assess genetic, epigenetic, or protein markers in feces, serum, and tissue. It may be possible to find biomarkers that will help with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by identifying the genes, RNAs, and/or proteins indicative of cancer growth. Recent advancements in the molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer, DNA methylation, microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, exosomes, and their involvement in colorectal cancer have led to the discovery of novel biomarkers. In small-scale investigations, most biomarkers appear promising. However, large-scale clinical trials are required to validate their effectiveness before routine clinical implementation. Hence, this review focuses on small-scale investigations and results of big data analysis that may provide an overview of the biomarkers for the diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.
- Front Matter
1
- 10.1016/j.clon.2015.11.005
- Dec 8, 2015
- Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
- Research Article
37
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0131363
- Jun 24, 2015
- PLOS ONE
Despite the demonstrated benefits of anti-EGFR/VEGF targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), many patients initially respond, but then show evidence of disease progression. New therapeutic strategies are needed to make the action of available drugs more efficient. Our study aimed to explore whether simultaneous targeting of EGFR/VEGF and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may aid the treatment and management of mCRC patients. The dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 and celecoxib were used to inhibit EGFR/VEGFR and COX-2, respectively, in colorectal cancer cells. COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib augmented the antitumoral and antiangiogenic efficacy of AEE788, as indicated by the inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis and G1 cell cycle arrest, down-regulation of VEGF production by cancer cells and reduction of cell migration. These effects were related with a blockade in the EGFR/VEGFR signaling axis. Notably, the combined AEE788/celecoxib treatment prevented β-catenin nuclear accumulation in tumor cells. This effect was associated with a significant downregulation of FOXM1 protein levels and an impairment in the interaction of this transcription factor with β-catenin, which is required for its nuclear localization. Furthermore, the combined treatment also reduced the expression of the stem cell markers Oct 3/4, Nanog, Sox-2 and Snail in cancer cells, and contributed to the diminution of the CSC subpopulation, as indicated by colonosphere formation assays. In conclusion, the combined treatment of AEE788 and celecoxib not only demonstrated enhanced anti-tumoral efficacy in colorectal cancer cells, but also reduced colon CSCs subpopulation by targeting stemness-related pathways. Therefore, the simultaneous targeting of EGFR/VEGF and COX-2 may aid in blocking mCRC progression and improve the efficacy of existing therapies in colorectal cancer.
- Research Article
32
- 10.1592/phco.28.11-supp.18s
- Nov 1, 2008
- Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
During the past decade, new therapies for colorectal cancer have emerged that significantly prolong survival times. The introduction of these new agents has resulted in changes in colorectal cancer treatment patterns; clinicians are now able to optimize therapy and minimize toxicity by developing individualized patient treatment plans using a variety of agents. Biologic agents, including bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, and cetuximab and panitumumab, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, are among the new therapies now recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) colon and rectal cancer treatment guidelines for use in first-, second-, and/or third-line colorectal cancer therapy. According to the NCCN guidelines, patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who are without contraindications are candidates to receive the anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies at some point during the treatment course.
- Research Article
14
- 10.2174/1573406416666201021142832
- Dec 1, 2021
- Medicinal Chemistry
Targeted therapies acting on specific molecular targets in cancer cells with better curative efficacy and lower toxicity have come into prominence for the management of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). COX-2 stands out as a plausible target for anticancer agents due to its pivotal role in tumor initiation, progression and invasion. Due to the importance of triazolothiadiazine scaffold in targeted anticancer drug discovery, the aim of this work is the design of new triazolothiadiazines as potential anticancer agents for the targeted therapy of NSCLC and CRC. New triazolo[3,4-b]-1,3,4-thiadiazines (2a-g) were synthesized via the ring closure reactions of 2-bromo-1-arylethanones with 4-amino-5-((5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-2,4- dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (1), which was obtained via the solvent-free reaction of 5- methoxy-2-methyl-3-indoleacetic acid with thiocarbohydrazide. MTT assay was performed to determine their cytotoxic effects on A549 human lung adenocarcinoma, Caco-2 human colorectal adenocarcinoma and CCD-19Lu human lung fibroblast cells. The most potent compounds were evaluated for their effects on apoptosis, caspase-3, mitochondrial membrane potential, cell cycle, ultrastructural morphological changes and COX-2 in A549 and Caco-2 cells. In silico docking and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) studies were also performed using Schrödinger's Maestro molecular modeling package. 6-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-[(5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl]-7H-[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4- b][1,3,4]thiadiazine (2e) was the most potent and selective anticancer agent in this series against A549 and Caco-2 cell lines. Compound 2e induced early apoptosis, caused mitochondrial membrane depolarization and arrested cell cycle at G0/G1 phase in A549 cells. On the other hand, compound 2e triggered intrinsic apoptotic pathway involving caspase-3 activation in Caco-2 cells. Compound 2e caused apoptotic morphological changes in both cancer cell lines. The cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of this compound on CRC were found to be related to its selective COX-2 inhibitory activity. According to molecular docking studies, compound 2e showed good affinity to the active site of COX-2 (PDB code: 4COX). Based on in silico ADME studies, the compound is predicted to possess a favorable ADME profile. According to in vitro and in silico studies, compound 2e was identified as a potential orally bioavailable anticancer agent for COX-2-targeted therapy of CRC.
- Research Article
182
- 10.1096/fasebj.13.11.1325
- Aug 1, 1999
- FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
G207 is a multi-mutated, replication-competent type-1 herpes simplex virus designed to target, infect, and lyse neurological tumors. This study examines the feasibility of using G207 in the treatment of human colorectal cancer and defines the biological determinants of its antitumor efficacy. This virus was tested on five human colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro to determine efficacy of infection and tumor cell kill. These results were correlated to measures of tumor cell proliferation. In vivo testing was performed through direct injections of G207 into xenografts of human colorectal cancer tumors grown in flanks of athymic rats. To evaluate an alternate method of administration, hepatic portal vein infusion of G207 was performed in a syngeneic model of liver metastases in Buffalo rats. Among the five cell lines tested, infection rates ranged between 10% and 90%, which correlated directly with S-phase fraction (8.6%-36.6%) and was proportional to response to G207 therapy in vitro (1%-93%). Direct injection of G207 into nude rat flank tumors suppressed tumor growth significantly vs. control (0.58 +/- 0.60 cm(3) vs. 9.16 +/- 3.70 cm(3), P<0. 0001). In vivo tumor suppression correlated with in vitro effect. In the syngeneic liver tumor model, portal infusion resulted in significant reduction in number of liver nodules (13 +/- 10 nodules in G207-treated livers vs. 80 +/- 30 nodules in control livers, P<0.05). G207 infects and kills human colorectal cancer cells efficiently. In vitro cytotoxicity assay and tumor S-phase fraction can be used to predict response to treatment in vivo. This antineoplastic agent can be delivered effectively by both direct tumor injection and regional vascular infusion. G207 should be investigated further as therapy for colorectal cancer and liver metastases.
- Research Article
- 10.1080/14712598.2022.2108700
- Aug 5, 2022
- Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Introduction Despite the use of multimodality therapy, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) still presents high rates of disease recurrence. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) remains the cornerstone of neoadjuvant therapy of LARC, and novel therapies are urgently needed in order to improve the clinical outcomes. Areas covered We aim to summarize data from completed and ongoing clinical trials addressing the role of biological therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and gene therapies in the systemic therapy of rectal cancer. Expert opinion Deeper understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has allowed meaningful advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic disease in the past few years. The larger applicability of biological therapy in CRC, including genome-guided targeted therapy, antiangiogenics, and immunotherapy, gives us optimism for the personalized management of rectal cancer. Microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors have demonstrated high sensitivity to ICIs, and preliminary findings in the neoadjuvant setting of rectal cancer are promising. To date, antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies in LARC have not demonstrated the same benefit seen in metastatic disease. The outstanding results accomplished by biomarker-guided therapy in metastatic CRC will guide future developments of biological therapy in LARC.
- Research Article
101
- 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0176
- Aug 5, 2019
- The Oncologist
Despite lengthening survival, death rates from metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unacceptably high, with a bright spot being the demonstration of durable responses in patients with CRC who have mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors and are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as nivolumab in combination with low-dose ipilimumab-all checkpoint inhibitors-are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Nonetheless, there are a number of questions and considerations in the use of these checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Using a question-and-answer format, this review summarizes the scientific rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in CRC, including the effects of tumor factors such as genetic aberrations and mutational load on the immune response, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR disease. We discuss response patterns, response criteria, and immune-related adverse events using findings from published efficacy and safety data of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic CRC. We also discuss issues surrounding treatment sequencing, incorporating approved checkpoint inhibitors into the current treatment paradigm, and the multiple investigational strategies that may optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC in the future, including novel combination therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Despite advances in chemotherapy, survival remains poor for patients with metastatic CRC. Certain immunotherapy agents have demonstrated long-lasting responses in previously treated patients with immune-responsive microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic CRC, leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab (with or without low-dose ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab in this population. Combination therapy (e.g., nivolumab with low-dose ipilimumab) has demonstrated numerically higher response rates and improved long-term clinical benefit relative to anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in the broader CRC population and novel combinations to optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC.
- Research Article
13
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.007
- Mar 10, 2010
- Gastroenterology
Colon Cancer: An Update and Future Directions
- Research Article
219
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5219
- Oct 12, 2016
- Science Translational Medicine
The survival benefit of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is limited to a few months because of acquired resistance. We show that anti-VEGF therapy induced remodeling of the extracellular matrix with subsequent alteration of the physical properties of colorectal liver metastases. Preoperative treatment with bevacizumab in patients with colorectal liver metastases increased hyaluronic acid (HA) deposition within the tumors. Moreover, in two syngeneic mouse models of CRC metastasis in the liver, we show that anti-VEGF therapy markedly increased the expression of HA and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs), without significantly changing collagen deposition. The density of these matrix components correlated with increased tumor stiffness after anti-VEGF therapy. Treatment-induced tumor hypoxia appeared to be the driving force for the remodeling of the extracellular matrix. In preclinical models, we show that enzymatic depletion of HA partially rescued the compromised perfusion in liver mCRCs after anti-VEGF therapy and prolonged survival in combination with anti-VEGF therapy and chemotherapy. These findings suggest that extracellular matrix components such as HA could be a potential therapeutic target for reducing physical barriers to systemic treatments in patients with mCRC who receive anti-VEGF therapy.
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201032
- Aug 9, 2025
- Molecular Therapy Oncology
Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies are the most recommended first-line treatment for RAS/RAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines. However, primary resistance renders this treatment ineffective for almost 40% of patients. Our previous work identified Aurora kinase A (AURKA) as a key resistance driver through non-canonical, Hippo-independent Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) activation. However, the role of the other main Hippo coactivator, transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), in this resistance mechanism remains unexplored. By integrating preclinical in vitro and in vivo models, including cell lines and patient-derived xenografts, with RNA sequencing, we investigated the impact of TAZ overexpression in cetuximab resistance driven by the AURKA/YAP1 axis. Our findings reveal that TAZ overexpression sustains YAP1-mediated resistance and stemness. Even under YAP1 suppression, TAZ-overexpressing cells remain unresponsive to anti-EGFR therapies, whereas dual YAP1/TAZ silencing restores sensitivity. Treatment with alisertib, a phase III AURKA inhibitor, simultaneously destabilizes YAP1 and TAZ, restoring anti-EGFR efficacy by suppressing stemness. Transcriptomic analyses further show that AURKA inhibition and dual YAP1/TAZ suppression disrupt stem-like traits and reveal transcriptional deregulations affecting nucleotide metabolism. These findings demonstrate that AURKA orchestrates YAP1/TAZ crosstalk, which is crucial for driving stemness and resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, highlighting AURKA inhibitors as a promising strategy to enhance anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic CRC.
- Research Article
- 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.12119
- Jun 1, 2024
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
12119 Background: Chemotherapy regimens used to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) often include a combination of a fluoropyrimidine (i.e., fluorouracil or capecitabine), folinic acid, irinotecan, and/or oxaliplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic disease. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to these regimens, such as neutropenia, severe diarrhea, and mucositis, can be severe or even life-threatening. Fluoropyrimidine (FP) and irinotecan-related toxicities in CRC are associated with certain germline polymorphisms in DPYD (*2A, *13, HapB3, and c.2846A>T) and UGT1A1 (*28 allele), respectively. Clinically actionable recommendations are available per the FDA and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) for DPYD poor metabolizers (PMs) and intermediate metabolizers (IMs) due to increased risk for FP-induced ADRs. The FDA also provides dosing guidance for UGT1A1PMs in an effort to minimize irinotecan-induced toxicities. The objective of this research was to observe the frequency of DPYDvariants (*2A, *13, HapB3, c.2846A>T, c.557A>G), UGT1A1 variants (*6, *28), and associated phenotypes in various racial and ethnic groups. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 8,640 samples genotyped for DPYD and UGT1A1 was conducted (OneOme, Minneapolis, MN). Phenotype and carrier frequencies were analyzed and stratified by self-reported ethnicity and race. Results: DPYD variants with reduced or no function were observed in 6% of all samples tested where 6% of patients having clinically actionable IM or PM status. UGT1A1 carrier frequency was 56% with 12% of patients with clinically actionable PM status. Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients carry DPYD and/or UGT1A1 variants that result in decreased metabolism of FPs and irinotecan, respectively. In this large sample size, a 6% DPYD risk variant carrier frequency is significantly more than an estimated 2%, as previously reported. The FDA and CPIC provide clinically actionable recommendations for these commonly used colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancer therapies in an effort to avoid severe and even life-threatening toxicities that may be potentiated by these germline variations. [Table: see text]
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.