Abstract
This chapter employs an interventionist framework to elucidate some issues having to do with explanation in neurobiology. I argue that this framework can be used to distinguish theories and models that are explanatory from those that are merely descriptive. This framework can also be used to characterize a notion of a mechanistic explanation, according to which mechanistic explanations are those that meet interventionist criteria for successful explanation and certain additional constraints as well. However, from an interventionist perspective, although mechanistic theories have a number of virtues, it is a mistake to think that such models are the only legitimate kind of explanation in neuroscience and psychology. In particular, some (but not all) dynamical systems models in neuroscience are explanatory as are many models, such as the Hodgkin-Huxley model, that abstract away from mechanistically relevant low-level detail.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.