Abstract

AbstractThis study examines channel dynamics and bed load transport through a riffle and pool sequence forced by downstream channel width variations within an experimental flume. The experiment consisted of four runs across, which we compare and contrast local and spatially averaged bed surface texture and topography, sediment transport rates, and sediment mobility at five locations across a pool‐riffle pair. Sediment transport was measured using mini Helley‐Smith samplers and particle tracers seeded in the monitored riffle and pool. In this study, “local” sediment transport rates were highly variable across the five monitoring locations. The lowest sediment transport rate was recorded at the riffle tail whereas the highest rates were measured at the riffle head and the pool center. The texture of the bed surface and transported load do not explain measured bed load transport trends and depending on how the measurements are aggregated differing interpretations are supported. In general, the bed texture in the pool was finer than the texture in the riffle, however, specific grain‐size percentile classes derived from pooled population analysis suggests little to no difference between pool and riffle texture. The combined results highlight the importance of acknowledging and applying analysis techniques to better understand the inherent variability of bed load transport within channel reaches where morphology differs, such as pools and riffles.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.