Abstract

When wooden supports of panel paintings have been severely altered or damaged and the original crossbeams are missing, new crossbeams or other types of auxiliary supports can be connected to the panel’s back-face in order to achieve desired effects including panel strengthening and control of deformations. In order to make such connection, the Restorers of Opificio delle Pietre Dure use small wooden blocks, each glued on the back face of the panel, and holding freely the head of a screw connected (often by means of springs) to the auxiliary support; the English term ‘buttons’ has been proposed for such blocks. This research examines in depth how the shape (conical or cylindrical) and dimensions (diameter in the 20-30 mm range, and thickness in the 3-6 mm range) of the buttons, all made from oak wood, influence their stiffness and load-carrying capacity. Each button was glued onto a dummy beech board by means of epoxy structural resin; a 3 mm diameter steel screw was inserted in each button’s hole prior to gluing, so that its head remained ‘trapped’ between the button’s cavity and the board. A short-term mechanical test was performed with a universal testing machine by axially pulling out the screw from the button. Load and displacement were recorded, and the load–displacement curves were analysed. The results showed that within the tested range: a) the ultimate load-carrying capacity of the buttons is only influenced by the residual thickness above the screw head, b) nor the shape nor the external diameter of the buttons have any influence on their mechanical properties, c) the stiffness (slope of the straight part of the load-displacement curve) of the connection depends only on the embedding of the screw head into the wood (i.e. mainly on the wood density).

Highlights

  • When wooden supports of panel paintings have been severely altered or damaged and the original cross beams are missing, new cross beams or other types of auxiliary supports can be connected to the panel’s back-face in order to achieve desired effects including panel strengthening and control of deformations [1, 2, 3, 4]

  • The results showed that within the tested range: a) the ultimate load-carrying capacity of the buttons is only influenced by the residual thickness above the screw head, b) nor the shape nor the external diameter of the buttons have any influence on their mechanical properties, c) the stiffness of the connection depends only on the embedding of the screw head into the wood

  • Load and displacement data were recorded, and the load– displacement curves were analysed. The analysis of these mechanical tests leads to the following main observation: a) the rupture occurs beyond the proportional limit, all the buttons do not suddenly fail, and b) the geometry of the holes strongly influences the mechanical behaviour of the buttons, since the countersink buttons show a stronger, together with a more deformable, behaviour the counterbore ones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When wooden supports of panel paintings have been severely altered or damaged and the original cross beams are missing, new cross beams or other types of auxiliary supports can be connected to the panel’s back-face in order to achieve desired effects including panel strengthening and control of deformations [1, 2, 3, 4]. The external geometry of the button was cylindrical and common for all the tested buttons; the hole trapping the flat screw was conceived counterbore and countersink. The buttons were glued on poplar dummy boards by epoxy resin (type UHU Plus), in order to guarantee that the failure would not occur at the glue line. Load and displacement data were recorded, and the load– displacement curves were analysed The analysis of these mechanical tests leads to the following main observation: a) the rupture occurs beyond the proportional limit, all the buttons do not suddenly fail, and b) the geometry of the holes strongly influences the mechanical behaviour of the buttons, since the countersink buttons show a stronger, together with a more deformable, behaviour the counterbore ones

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.