Abstract
Dynamic stall control using pulsed blowing is compared with control by constant blowing for an OA209 airfoil. Flow control was by blowing from 42 portholes, flush with the airfoil surface, of diameter 1 % chord positioned at 10 % chord and with separation 6.7 % chord. Light stall at Mach 0.3 could be fully suppressed by constant blowing, and for deep stall a pitching moment peak reduction of 65% was seen. For the jet configuration and test cases investigated in this paper, pulsed blowing at 100–500 Hz was found to be at best as effective as constant blowing with the same mass flux for the control of dynamic stall.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
