Abstract
The combustion characteristics of an opposed-piston two-stroke gasoline engine are investigated with experiment. The energy conversion and exergy destruction are analyzed and the organization method of the combustion process is summarized. The effects of phase difference, scavenging pressure, injection timing, ignition timing, and dual spark plug ignition scheme on the combustion process and engine performance are discussed, respectively. The heat release rate of the opposed-piston two-stroke gasoline engine is consistent with the conventional gasoline engine. With the increase of opposed-piston motion phase difference, the scavenging efficiency decreases and overmuch residual exhaust gas is not beneficial to the combustion process. Meanwhile, the faster relative velocity of the opposed-piston near the inner dead center enhances the cylinder working volume change rate, which leads to the rapid decline of in-cylinder pressure and temperature. The 15 °CA of opposed-piston motion phase difference improves the scavenging and combustion process effectively. When scavenging pressure is 0.12 MPa, the scavenging efficiency and heat release rate are improved at medium-high speed conditions. With the delay of injection timing, the flame developing period decreases gradually, and the rapid burning period decreases and then increases. The rapid burning period may reach the minimum value when the injection advance angle is 100 °CA. With the delay of ignition timing, the flame developing period increases gradually, and the rapid combustion period decreases and then increases. The rapid combustion period may reach the minimum value when the ignition advance angle is 20 °CA. Notably, the flat-top piston structure should be matched with the dual spark plug, which the ignition advance angle is 20 °CA at medium-high load conditions.
Highlights
Facing the energy and environmental crisis, traditional fuel engines have gradually realized a variety of combustion methods such as the premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI), low-temperature combustion (LTC), homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI), high-pressure common rail (CR) technology, gasoline direct injection (GDI) technology, variable valve time (TTV) technology, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) technology, and special combustion chamber structures [1]
Turner et al analyzed and optimized the scavenging volume and indicated the fuel consumption rate of a direct-injection two-stroke gasoline engine, and the results showed that the opposed-piston configuration could achieve maximum expansion and minimum heat transfer, so the fuel consumption was reduced by 9.6% compared with a normal return scavenging engine [13]
This study aims to analyze the OP2S-GDI engine combustion process and to evaluate the effect of a unique combustion system and opposed-piston relative movement rule on the performance and combustion characteristics of the OP2S-GDI engine by using the rate of heat release (ROHR) and cylinder gas pressure (CGP)
Summary
Facing the energy and environmental crisis, traditional fuel engines have gradually realized a variety of combustion methods such as the premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI), low-temperature combustion (LTC), homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI), high-pressure common rail (CR) technology, gasoline direct injection (GDI) technology, variable valve time (TTV) technology, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) technology, and special combustion chamber structures [1]. Turner et al analyzed and optimized the scavenging volume and indicated the fuel consumption rate of a direct-injection two-stroke gasoline engine, and the results showed that the opposed-piston configuration could achieve maximum expansion and minimum heat transfer, so the fuel consumption was reduced by 9.6% compared with a normal return scavenging engine [13]. This study aims to analyze the OP2S-GDI engine combustion process and to evaluate the effect of a unique combustion system and opposed-piston relative movement rule on the performance and combustion characteristics of the OP2S-GDI engine by using the ROHR and CGP. OP2S-GDI engine achieves separation of fuel injection and scavenging process and rapid combustion by adopting uniflow scavenging method, gasoline direct injection, and dual spark plug ignition. Structure Parameters Bore (mm) Stroke (mm) Connecting rod (mm) Effective compression Ratio (-) Engine speed (rpm) Number of intake ports (-) Number of exhaust ports (-) Intake port height stroke ratio (-) Exhaust port height stroke ratio (-) Intake port circumference ratio (-) Exhaust port circumference ratio (-) Opposed-piston phase difference (◦CA) Intake port radial angle (◦) Exhaust port radial angle (◦) Power (kW) Fuel consumption rate (g/kW h)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.