Abstract

In bi-parental species, reproduction is not only a crucial life-history stage where individuals must take fitness-related decisions, but these decisions also need to be adjusted to the behavioural strategies of other individuals. Hence, communication is required, which could be facilitated by informative signals. Yet, these signalling traits might have (co-)evolved in multiple contexts, as various family members usually meet and interact during reproduction. In this study, we experimentally explored for the first time whether a colourful plumage trait in adults acts as a signal that regulates multiple intra-family interactions in a bird species, the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). We expected that an experimental reduction of adults’ UV/yellow reflectance (i.e. a reduction of apparent individual quality) should affect the behavioural strategies of all family members. We found evidence for this at least in adults, since the partners of UV-blocked individuals (either males or females) increased their parental investment — perhaps to compensate for the apparent lower condition of their mates. As the UV-blocked adult did not change its provisioning behaviour, the partner presumably responded to the manipulated signal and not to a behavioural change. However, the offspring did not co-adjust their begging intensity to the experimental treatment. It is thus possible that they responded to overall parental care rather than the signal. These results suggest that UV/yellow colouration of adult blue tits may act as quality signal revealing the rearing capacity to mates.Significance statementHow parents respond to signals of genetic or phenotypic quality of their mates has received significant attention. However, previous studies have primarily focused on the receiver’s response and have not always controlled for the signaller’s behaviour and its investment in reproduction. Our results provide the first experimental evidence that ultraviolet (UV)/yellow colouration acts as a signal of parental quality in the blue tit. Parents responded by increasing their effort when paired with UV-blocked (low-quality) mates, while controlling for the mate’s behaviour. We argue that the reduced expression of the signal triggered a compensatory response in the mate. Interestingly, both males and females responded similarly to changes in mate’s UV/yellow reflectance, suggesting similar rules over investment in response to this trait. However, nestlings, a potential (and often neglected) set of observers of parental signals, did not change their behaviour when raised by an UV-blocked (= low-quality) parent.

Highlights

  • Communication is a co-evolutionary process that involves the transfer of information from a sender to a receiver (Bradbury and Vehrencamp 2011)

  • Our results provide the first experimental evidence that ultraviolet (UV)/yellow colouration acts as a signal of parental quality in the blue tit

  • To enhance reproductive success, caregivers should adjust their level of investment according to the quality of the current reproductive event, which depends on (i) environmental conditions like habitat quality (CapillaLasheras et al 2017) or resource availability (Hakkarainen et al 1997), (ii) their own condition and their rearing capacity (Ots and Hõrak 1998), and (iii) the condition of their mate, which can be derived from signals of quality (Velando et al 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Communication is a co-evolutionary process that involves the transfer of information from a sender to a receiver (Bradbury and Vehrencamp 2011) This process is subject to selection, where both senders and receivers try to optimize their fitness as a result of their interaction (Zahavi 1981). These traits typically reflect health or condition (Folstad and Karter 1992) and may function as signals of quality. Individuals respond to these signalling traits to modulate fitness-related decisions — like where to live, what to eat, and whom to interact with (Danchin et al 2004). To enhance reproductive success, caregivers should adjust their level of investment according to the quality of the current reproductive event, which depends on (i) environmental conditions like habitat quality (CapillaLasheras et al 2017) or resource availability (Hakkarainen et al 1997), (ii) their own condition and their rearing capacity (Ots and Hõrak 1998), and (iii) the condition of their mate, which can be derived from signals of quality (Velando et al 2006)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.