Experience with plate-and-frame ultrafiltration and hyperfiltration systems for desalination of water and purification of waste water

Both brackish water desalination and seawater desalination processes are well established and in common use around the globe to create new water supply sources. The farther the location of the source water from the ocean or seashore, the lower the salinity (TDS) of the water and the lower the osmotic pressure that needs to be overcome when desalinated water is produced. This is one of the major reasons that brackish desalination is often considered less costly than seawater desalination. A number of project considerations, however, indicate that seawater desalination can be beneficial and more cost-effective than brackish water desalination. To make a fair comparison, we need to properly compare all major aspects of both types of projects to define the best and most appropriate desalination technology. While brackish water has less feed water TDS, it is more challenging to dispose of the produced concentrate. Also, although brackish water desalination needs less energy to overcome osmotic pressure, it usually requires more energy to draw the water from the well than it takes to pump seawater from the open ocean intake. Another factor is that the temperature of the brackish well water may be lower than the temperature of ocean water, giving seawater desalination an advantage in energy demand. In comparing brackish to seawater desalination, these major aspects should be evaluated: (1) Locations of seawater and brackish water plants, relative to the major consumers of the desalinated water, (2) Transportation (pumping and disposal) costs of the feed water and produced water, (3) Potential colocation of a seawater plant with a large industrial user (e.g., power plant) of the seawater for cooling or other purposes, (4) Produced quality of brackish water and seawater desalination in terms of major minerals and emerging contaminants, (5) Sustainability of the water source: capacity and depth of the brackish water wells, as well as the type of soil. (6) Technical and economic aspects of produced concentrate disposal, (7) Permitting process costs for brackish and seawater desalination, and (8) The economics of both brackish and seawater desalination treatment processes: capital costs, operational and maintenance (O&M) costs, lifetime water cost, and total water cost (TWC). This paper discusses the major evaluation criteria and considerations involved in properly comparing the economic and technical aspects of brackish and seawater desalination to determine the more favorable desalination technology for a given desalination project.

Desalination and disinfection of inland brackish ground water in a capacitive deionization cell using nanoporous activated carbon cloth electrodes

The role of desalination in bridging the water gap in Jordan

Desalination of brackish water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis

Hybrid systems in seawater desalination-practical design aspects, status and development perspectives

Research progress of sodium super ionic conductor electrode materials for capacitive deionization

This article deals with the desalination of seawater and brackish water, which can deal with the problem of water scarcity that threatens certain countries in the world; it is now possible to meet the demand for drinking water. Currently, among the various desalination processes, the reverse osmosis technique is the most used. Electrical energy consumption is the most attractive factor in the cost of operating seawater by reverse osmosis in desalination plants. Desalination of water by solar energy can be considered as a very important drinking water alternative. For determining the electrical energy consumption of a single reverse osmosis module, we used the System Advisor Model (SAM) to determine the technical characteristics and costs of a parabolic cylindrical installation and Reverse Osmosis System Analysis (ROSA) to obtain the electrical power of a single reverse osmosis module. The electrical power of a single module is 4101 KW; this is consistent with the manufacturer's data that this power must be between 3900 kW and 4300 KW. Thus, the energy consumption of the system is 4.92 KWh/m3.Thermal power produced by the solar cylindro-parabolic field during the month of May has the maximum that is 208MWth, and the minimum value during the month of April, which equals 6 MWth. Electrical power produced by the plant varied between 47MWe, and 23.8MWe. The maximum energy was generated during the month of July (1900 MWh) with the maximum energy stored (118 MWh).

A<scp>uthors</scp>’ R<scp>eply</scp>

A series of thin‐film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes with incorporation of Laponite nanoclays (NC‐LAP) is prepared and demonstrated for brackish water and seawater desalination. It is the first attempt to use poly(ethylene glycol) 200 (PEG200) assisted Laponite as nanofillers to improve the performance of TFN membranes for reverse osmosis (RO) seawater desalination. The influence of NC‐LAP loading and PEG200 as the dispersant on membrane properties is investigated. An increase in NC‐LAP loading results in an increase in water permeability without sacrificing the salt rejection. At the loading of 0.3 wt%, the TFN membrane shows a water permeability of 2.7 L m−2 h−1 bar−1 (LMH bar−1) and a salt rejection of 98.18% for brackish water desalination at 20 bar and 25 ± 1 °C. This water permeability is 53% higher than the conventional thin‐film composite (TFC) membrane. A steady water flux above 35 LMH is obtained when using seawater as the feed at 50 bar and 25 ± 1 °C. The existence of PEG200 to effectively disperse NC‐LAP nanoparticles is essential to fabricate the NC‐LAP incorporated TFN membranes for brackish water and seawater desalination.

Desalination and the environment

Desalination and the environment

Thin-film nanocomposite membranes incorporated with defective ZIF-8 nanoparticles for brackish water and seawater desalination

Hybrid membrane system for desalination and wastewater treatment : Integrating forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis

The integration of desalination plants and mineral production

Due to unstainable use of natural water resources, alternative water resources such as brackish water and seawater desalination have been an emerging solution. However, development of desalination capacity is limited due to the high energy requirements for removing salt ions from water. Currently, capacitive deionization technology (CDI), following the working principle of supercapacitors, has attracted considerable attention from academia, industry, and government agency. As compared to conventional desalination technologies, CDI has several advantages including low energy consumption, easy regeneration, high water recovery, and no secondary waste. In CDI, by applying an external electric filed between two parallel of nanoporous carbon electrodes (i.e., carbon aerogel, activated carbons, carbon nanotubes, and graphene), ions can be stored at the electrode/solution interface via electrical double layer (EDL) formation. Additionally, microbial desalination cell (MDC) is a new bioelectrochemical technology for seawater desalination with simultaneous electricity generation and wastewater treatment. Basically, a MDC reactor contains an anode chamber, a desalination chamber, and a cathode chamber. In MDC, microorganisms can oxidize organic waters in wastewater to harvest electric energy, and meanwhile, salt ions can be removed during the electricity generating process. In this study, we propose a hybrid electrochemical desalination system for seawater desalination by coupling CDI device with a MDC reactor. As a result, MDC produced electricity with open circuit voltage of 0.8 V and a current of 3 mA by using bacteria to degrade organic contaminants through anode bacterial oxidation and cathode reduction. In MDC, 91% removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in synthetic wastewater can be achieved, and the solution conductivity can be reduced from 17,000 µS/cm to about 200 µS/cm. More importantly, CDI device can be driven by electricity harvesting from the two MDCs in parallel, and as the downstream desalination process to further desalinate salt water. The results of this study can demonstrate the feasibility of the integrated electrochemical MDC-CDI system for simultaneous wastewater treatment, power production, and water desalination. .