Abstract

Dehydrogenation promoters greatly enhance the performance of SiO2–MgO catalysts in the Lebedev process. Here, the effect of preparation method and order of addition of Cu on the structure and performance of Cu-promoted SiO2–MgO materials is detailed. Addition of Cu to MgO via incipient wetness impregnation (IWI) or coprecipitation (CP) prior to wet-kneading with SiO2 gave similar butadiene yields (∼40%) as when Cu was added to the already wet-kneaded catalyst. In contrast, the catalyst prepared by impregnation of Cu on SiO2 first proved to be the worst catalyst of the series. TEM, XRD, and XPS analyses suggested that, for all catalyst materials, Cu2+ forms a solid solution with MgO. This was confirmed by UV–vis, XANES, and EXAFS data, with Cu being found in a distorted octahedral geometry. As a result, the acid–base properties, as determined by Pyridine- and CDCl3–IR as well as NH3-TPD, are modified, contributing to the improved performance. Operando XANES and EXAFS studies of the evolution of the copper ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.