Abstract

The past processes that have shaped geographic patterns of genetic diversity may be difficult to infer from current patterns. However, in species with sex differences in dispersal, differing phylogeographic patterns between mitochondrial (mt) and nuclear (nu) DNA may provide contrasting insights into past events. Forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) were impacted by climate and habitat change during the Pleistocene, which likely shaped phylogeographic patterns in mitochondrial (mt) DNA that have persisted due to limited female dispersal. By contrast, the nuclear (nu) DNA phylogeography of forest elephants in Central Africa has not been determined. We therefore examined the population structure of Central African forest elephants by genotyping 94 individuals from six localities at 21 microsatellite loci. Between forest elephants in western and eastern Congolian forests, there was only modest genetic differentiation, a pattern highly discordant with that of mtDNA. Nuclear genetic patterns are consistent with isolation by distance. Alternatively, male‐mediated gene flow may have reduced the previous regional differentiation in Central Africa suggested by mtDNA patterns, which likely reflect forest fragmentation during the Pleistocene. In species like elephants, male‐mediated gene flow erases the nuclear genetic signatures of past climate and habitat changes, but these continue to persist as patterns in mtDNA because females do not disperse. Conservation implications of these results are discussed.

Highlights

  • Morphological and genetic studies have strongly supported recognition of two African elephant species: the African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and African forest elephant (L. cyclotis) (Comstock et al, 2002; Groves & Grubb, 2000; Ishida et al, 2011; Roca, Georgiadis, Pecon-­Slattery, & O’Brien, 2001; Rohland et al, 2010)

  • Mitochondrial DNA patterns have been examined in African forest elephants across their range (Debruyne, 2005; Debruyne, Van Holt, Barriel, & Tassy, 2003; Eggert, Rasner, & Woodruff, 2002; Ishida, Georgiadis, Hondo, & Roca, 2013; Johnson et al, 2007; Nyakaana, Arctander, & Siegismund, 2002)

  • The phylogeographic patterns revealed by analyses of Y-­chromosome sequences is similar to the pattern for other nuclear markers, but different from patterns shown by Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), supporting the role of males in establishing nuclear phylogeographic patterns (Roca, Georgiadis, & O’Brien, 2007; Roca et al, 2005)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Morphological and genetic studies have strongly supported recognition of two African elephant species: the African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and African forest elephant (L. cyclotis) (Comstock et al, 2002; Groves & Grubb, 2000; Ishida et al, 2011; Roca, Georgiadis, Pecon-­Slattery, & O’Brien, 2001; Rohland et al, 2010). Several factors can lead to discordant patterns in the phylogeography of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers, both within and across species (Petit & Excoffier, 2009; Toews & Brelsford, 2012), and in elephants, there is evidence that female philopatry and male-­biased dispersal combine to produce incongruent mitonuclear patterns (Debruyne, 2005; Roca, Georgiadis, & O’Brien, 2005). Because mitochondrial phylogeographic patterns are often discordant from nuclear patterns in species in which only males disperse (Petit & Excoffier, 2009; Toews & Brelsford, 2012), including elephants (Roca et al, 2005, 2007), there is a strong need to analyze nuclear markers among forest elephants to examine more completely their evolutionary history and population structure. We examined nuclear genetic markers for geographic differences among forest elephant localities.

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.