Evidence of objection to speakers and objections to it, a critical analytical study

Abstract

This research aims to provide a critical and analytical study of the evidence of reluctance among speakers and the objections raised against it. It seeks to clarify the true nature of this evidence and highlight the most prominent philosophical and rhetorical objections to it. The research is conducted within the framework of Sunni and community beliefs and employs an analytical-inductive approach by examining the statements of the speakers regarding the evidence of reluctance and the objections raised against it. The findings suggest that the evidence of reluctance is fundamentally sound and does not face any inherent issues. Furthermore, the philosophical and verbal objections to it are found to lack coherence. However, it is observed that theologians have committed significant oversights by focusing on the unification of divinity while neglecting its implications, particularly the unification of divinity.