Abstract

Reports an error in "Evidence for childhood origins of conscientiousness: Testing a developmental path from toddler age to adolescence" by Sanghag Kim and Grazyna Kochanska (Developmental Psychology, 2019[Jan], Vol 55[1], 196-206). In the article, due to a minor syntax error, the descriptive data for the 12-item child Conscientiousness variables (each item rated 0-4) were reported incorrectly. The correct values are as follows: Mother-rated scores, M = 30.41, SD = 10.09, range 0-46; father-rated scores, M = 30.42, SD 9.43, range 7-47 (Table 1, p. 200); family-level (average across parents) scores, M = 30.45, SD = 9.16, range 7-46 (text, p. 200). In the analyses conducted with the corrected variables, all the findings reported in the article and in the supplemental materials were unchanged. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-55000-001.) We tested empirically a theoretical model of early origins of conscientiousness proposed by Eisenberg, Duckworth, Spinrad, and Valiente (2014). The model posited a developmental interplay between children's early effortful control (EC) and internalized or committed compliance with parents as leading to future conscientiousness. We followed a community sample of 102 community mothers, fathers, and children from toddlerhood to adolescence. Observers coded children's EC in batteries of behavioral tasks (at ages 2 and 3) and committed compliance in lengthy discipline interactions with each parent, observed from preschool to early school age (at ages 4.5, 5.5, and 6.5). Parents rated adolescents' conscientiousness using an established personality questionnaire (at age 14). We supported several components of the theoretical model. Mediation analyses, conducted at the family level (across mother-child and father-child dyads) and separate analyses for mother-child and father-child dyads all supported the mediated path, from child EC to committed compliance to conscientiousness. Analyses for mother-child dyads additionally revealed that the indirect effect was present only for children with relatively low EC scores but not those with relatively high EC scores (moderated mediation), also as anticipated in the theoretical model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.