Evidence-Based Practices: Views, Knowledge and Support Status of Special Education Teachers

The complexity of special education and the variability among students Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) require special education teachers to make a concerted effort to provide validated supports that contribute to their students’ learning outcomes. Among the most important considerations for teachers is the use of teaching practices supported as effective by evidence. There is a broad consensus that the use of Evidence Based Practices (EBPs) can lead to significant improvements for students with ASD and their families. The research to practice gap is widely recognised in special education in relation to the selection and implementation of EBPs, with several studies finding that teachers used unsupported teaching practices as frequently as those supported by empirical evidence. Thus, in order to utilise EBPs, teachers must first understand what EBPs mean and how a particular practice comes to be evidence-based. Aligning with this emphasis and the increasing introduction of EBPs in special education globally, this study explored special education teachers’ understanding of evidence, evidence-based, and EBPs in one centre of autism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). In this study, a qualitative approach was used. Within this approach, a single case study design was adopted. The data were collected from six special education teachers of students with ASD using interviews. The findings revealed that teachers referred to their own individual experiences or the experiences of other teachers as evidence. In addition, they referred to their superiors’ advice as being evidence-based and the perceived EBPs as technical tools handed to them by the Centre. This indicated that teachers’ understanding of evidence-based, and EBPs was constructed based on the culture of the Centre. The findings of this study suggest several courses of action for future research, and policymakers and teacher education. Keywords: autism, Evidence Based Practices (EBPs), special education teachers, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Measuring and Evaluating Clinical Context in Implementation Science Research.

This study examined the efforts of states' mental health authorities to promote the use of evidence-based practices through policy. Data were drawn from three components of a national study, including a survey of state children's mental health directors (N=53), which was developed using a three-step process that involved stakeholders. Data from the directors' survey revealed that over 90% of states are implementing strategies to support the use of evidence-based practices. The scope of these efforts varies, with 36% reporting statewide reach. Further, states' strategies for implementing evidence-based practices are often not accompanied by comparable efforts to enhance information systems, even though enhancing such systems can bolster opportunities for successful implementation. Variability in the adoption of evidence-based practices, poor attention to information systems, and inconsistent fiscal policies threaten states' efforts to improve the quality of children's mental health services.

Administrative and leadership requirements are crucial to the application of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in special education. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the availability of administrative and leadership requirements for applying EBPs in special education programs from the teachers’ perspective, as well as determine the differences in their availability depending on the variables of disability category (intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and learning disabilities (LDs)) and school stage (e.g., primary or middle school). The sample included 243 special education teachers working in the city of Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire on the administrative and leadership requirements for implementing EBPs in special education programs (prepared by the researchers) was used to collect data. The results revealed the availability (which ranged from moderate to high) of administrative and leadership requirements for implementing EBPs. Moreover, there were differences in the availability of administrative and leadership requirements according to students’ disability category; these differences were in favor of the learning disability group. However, there were no differences according to the academic stage. We recommend conducting further research on administrative and leadership requirements using different methods.

Understanding implementation strategies of Approved Clinical Instructors (ACIs) who use evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical instruction will help promote the use of EBP in clinical practice. To examine the perspectives and experiences of ACIs using EBP concepts in undergraduate athletic training education programs to determine the importance of using these concepts in clinical practice, clinical EBP implementation strategies for students, and challenges of implementing EBP into clinical practice while mentoring and teaching their students. Qualitative study. Telephone interviews. Sixteen ACIs (11 men, 5 women; experience as a certified athletic trainer = 10 ± 4.7 years, experience as an ACI = 6.8 ± 3.9 years) were interviewed. We interviewed each participant by telephone. Interview transcripts were analyzed and coded for common themes and subthemes regarding implementation strategies. Established themes were triangulated through peer review and member checking to verify the data. The ACIs identified EBP implementation as important for validation of the profession, changing paradigm shift, improving patient care, and improving student educational experiences. They promoted 3 methods of implementing EBP concepts with their students: self-discovery, promoting critical thinking, and sharing information. They assisted students with the steps of EBP and often faced challenges in implementation of the first 3 steps of EBP: defining a clinical question, literature searching, and literature appraisal. Finally, ACIs indicated that modeling the behavior of making clinical decisions based on evidence was the best way to encourage students to continue using EBP. Athletic training education program directors should encourage and recommend specific techniques for EBP implementation in the clinical setting. The ACIs believed that role modeling is a strategy that can be used to promote the use of EBP with students. Training of ACIs should include methods by which to address the steps of the EBP process while still promoting critical thinking.

This study examined turnover rates of teams implementing psychosocial evidence-based practices in public-sector mental health settings. It also explored the relationship between turnover and implementation outcomes in an effort to understand whether practitioner perspectives on turnover are related to implementation outcomes. Team turnover was measured for 42 implementing teams participating in a national demonstration project examining implementation of five evidence-based practices between 2002 and 2005. Regression techniques were used to analyze the effects of team turnover on penetration and fidelity. Qualitative data collected throughout the project were blended with the quantitative data to examine the significance of team turnover to those attempting to implement the practices. High team turnover was common (M+/-SD=81%+/-46%) and did not vary by practice. The 24-month turnover rate was inversely related to fidelity scores at 24 months (N=40, beta=-.005, p=.01). A negative trend was observed for penetration. Further analysis indicated that 71% of teams noted that turnover was a relevant factor in implementation. The behavioral health workforce remains in flux. High turnover most often had a negative impact on implementation, although some teams were able to use strategies to improve implementation through turnover. Implementation models must consider turbulent behavioral health workforce conditions.

Students with emotional disturbance (ED) depend upon special education teachers (SETs) to use evidence-based practices (EBPs) to promote their well-being. SETs, in turn, depend upon school leaders to provide working conditions that support learning and implementation of academic and social EBPs. We conducted an integrative narrative review of research examining working conditions SETs experience serving students with ED in self-contained schools and classes, to better understand whether SETs in these settings experience conditions necessary to effectively implement academic and social EBPs. Our findings suggest that conditions necessary for learning and implementing EBPs are seldom present in these settings. In addition, the extant research on SETs’ working conditions in these settings is largely disconnected from research investigating teachers’ use of EBPs.

BackgroundThe goal of this study is to extend research on evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation by examining the impact of organizational type (public versus private) and organizational support for EBP on provider attitudes toward EBP and EBP use. Both organization theory and theory of innovation uptake and individual adoption of EBP guide the approach and analyses in this study. We anticipated that private sector organizations would provide greater levels of organizational support for EBPs leading to more positive provider attitudes towards EBPs and EBP use. We also expected attitudes toward EBPs to mediate the association of organizational support and EBP use.MethodsParticipants were mental health service providers from 17 communities in 16 states in the United States (n = 170). Path analyses were conducted to compare three theoretical models of the impact of organization type on organizational support for EBP and of organizational support on provider attitudes toward EBP and EBP use.ResultsConsistent with our predictions, private agencies provided greater support for EBP implementation, and staff working for private agencies reported more positive attitudes toward adopting EBPs. Organizational support for EBP partially mediated the association of organization type on provider attitudes toward EBP. Organizational support was significantly positively associated with attitudes toward EBP and EBP use in practice.ConclusionThis study offers further support for the importance of organizational context as an influence on organizational support for EBP and provider attitudes toward adopting EBP. The study demonstrates the role organizational support in provider use of EBP in practice. This study also suggests that organizational support for innovation is a malleable factor in supporting use of EBP. Greater attention should be paid to organizational influences that can facilitate the dissemination and implementation of EBPs in community settings.

Background: The evidence-based practice movement has spread globally, prompting calls for evidence-based policymaking and public health. Health care being the dynamic discipline with research, is, intended to improve practice through evidence-based novel approaches. As evidence based practice (EBP) among nurses is essential for improving the quality of care, fewer pieces of evidence are available in Nepal. This study aimed to assess the perception of evidence-based practice among nurses of a tertiary hospital in Nepal. Methods: We conducted a quantitative cross-sectional study among the 100 nurses of Bir Hospital in Kathmandu. The self-administered questionnaires were applied using the survey instrument by Upton and Upton. A purposive sampling technique was employed. We calculated the mean score to assess the nurses’ perceptions in the three sub-scales of knowledge, attitude, and use of evidence-based practice. Bivariate analysis was performed to examine the relationship between subscales. Results: The majority (89.0%) of nurses did not receive training on evidence-based practices. The mean score of knowledge on EBP was 4.47±1.11, the mean score of attitude on EBP was 4.45±1.06, and the mean score of EBP use was 4.18±1.42. EBP knowledge, attitude, and use were not significantly associated with the selected demographic variables (age, work experience, EBP training and marital status). Conclusion: Nurses’ perceptions of evidence-based practice were moderate. The implementation of EBP use needs to be strengthened among the nurses. Nurses need to be more involved in the implementation of EBP. To incorporate evidence in practice, nurses require training and support from high authorities.

With increased regulation and scrutiny of outcomes, hospice programs are being challenged to consider the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). This study reports findings from hospice director interviews and staff focus groups, which occurred following the completion of a multifaceted translating research into practice (TRIP) intervention designed to promote evidence-based pain management practices. The purpose of this article is to provide background on the use of EBPs, to report facilitators and barriers to overall implementation of pain management EBPs in hospice, and to provide recommendations for hospices interested in increasing the use of EBPs. Three areas for evaluation prior to implementing an EBP initiative in hospices were identified: community, agency, and staff cultures. Recommendations for implementation of EBPs in hospices are provided.

Part C Early Intervention (EI) systems are an entry point to services for autistic toddlers and can be leveraged to facilitate access to autism evidence-based practices (EBPs). However, EI systems are complex and limited research has examined how an EI system's infrastructure (i.e. system-level factors) impacts the adoption and implementation of EBPs. To address this gap, 36 EI providers and 9 EI administrators completed a semi-structured interview or focus group about factors impacting the implementation of autism EBPs. Qualitative analysis included a combination of grounded theory and causative coding. Analyses were refined by input from providers, administrators, and family stakeholders in the form of round tables and presentations at the state's interagency coordinating council. Primary themes centered on: (1) the costs associated with independent contracting structures; (2) operational demands; (3) workforce stability; (4) communication consistency; and (5) implementation supports for EBP implementation. Causative coding helped to demonstrate the perceived relationships between these factors and underscored the important role of incentivization structures, collaboration opportunities, and championing in supporting the use of EBPs within a system that primarily uses independent contracting structures. The current study extends previous research by demonstrating how several system-level factors are perceived to play a role in the adoption and implementation of EBPs by independently contracted EI providers. These findings underscore the need for implementation strategies, such as incentivization strategies and social network building, to increase providers' implementation of autism EBPs within EI systems.

Inner context organizational factors proximally shape therapist experiences with evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation and may influence therapist self-efficacy, which has been linked to sustained use of EBPs in community mental health settings. Research has primarily focused on constructs such as implementation leadership and climate. However, the effects of such factors may depend upon other inner context dimensions, such as psychological safety. Psychologically safe environments are conducive to taking risks, speaking up about problems, and requesting feedback and may promote therapist self-efficacy during implementation. This study examines whether organizational sustainment leadership and sustainment climate relate to therapist EBP self-efficacy only under conditions of psychological safety. Data were collected from 410 clinicians in 85 programs during the sustainment phase of a system-driven implementation of multiple EBPs in children's mental health services. Therapists reported on their organization's sustainment leadership, sustainment climate, psychological safety, and their own self-efficacy in delivering specific EBPs. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted to account for nested data structure. Among program-level variables, sustainment leadership and psychological safety both significantly predicted therapist self-efficacy. However, there were no significant interactions between program-level sustainment climate and psychological safety. Exploratory post-hoc analyses revealed a significant interaction between program-level sustainment leadership and therapist-level perceptions of psychological safety such that that the conditional effect of psychological safety on EBP self-efficacy was significant at high levels of sustainment leadership, but not at low or average levels. We noted independent links between sustainment leadership, organizational psychological safety and therapists feelings of confidence and mastery with EBPs. Therapists' individual perceptions of psychological safety were linked to self-efficacy only in programs with high sustainment leadership. Thus, sustainment leadership and psychological safety may both represent implementation intervention targets, but it may not be critical to assess for perceptions of psychological safety before deploying organizational leadership strategies.Plain language abstract Therapist self-efficacy is a therapist's belief that they are capable, knowledgeable, and skilled enough to deliver evidence-based practices (EBPs), and is thought to promote improved clinical and implementation outcomes, such as therapists' sustained use of EBPs. Conditions within community mental health organizations may influence therapists' sense of EBP self-efficacy. Leaders' support and expectations for EBP implementation, and collective staff perceptions about the organization's climate to support EBPs are linked to positive therapist attitudes and EBP adoption. However, less is known about how these implementation-specific organizational factors associated with therapist EBP self-efficacy in the long-term, and how this may depend on general workplace conditions. Specifically, psychologically safe environments - where therapists feel safe taking risks such as asking questions, admitting mistakes, and trying new skills - may be needed to promote self-efficacy when therapists are tasked with learning and using complex multi-component EBP innovations. The current study tested the prediction that leader-driven and program-wide focus on EBP sustainment may promote therapist EBP self-efficacy only in organizations where conditions for learning are psychologically safe. Our findings confirmed that fostering strong sustainment focused leadership and psychologically safe environments may each be important for increasing therapists' EBP self-efficacy. The model results suggested that individual therapist perceptions of psychological safety were more strongly related to EBP self-efficacy in programs with greater implementation leadership. Findings suggest the importance of increasing EBP leadership behavior to fully potentiate other facilitating conditions for therapist learning in the sustainment phase of EBP implementation initiatives.

BackgroundThis study examines how system-wide (i.e., region, district, and school) mechanisms such as leadership support, training requirements, structure, collaboration, and education affect the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in schools and how this affects the outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite growing evidence for the positive effects of EBPs for ASD, these practices are not consistently or effectively used in schools. Although special education programs are mandated to use EBPs, there are very few evidence-based methods for selecting, implementing, and sustaining EBPs. Research focuses primarily on teacher training, without attention to contextual factors (e.g., implementation climate, attitudes toward EBPs, resource allocation, and social networks) that may impact outcomes. Using an implementation science framework, this project will prospectively examine relations between system-wide factors and teachers’ use of EBPs and student education outcomes.Methods/designSurvey data will be collected from approximately 85 regional special education directors, 170 regional program specialists, 265 district special education directors, 265 behavior specialists, 925 school principals, 3538 special education teachers, and 2700 paraprofessionals. Administrative data for the students with ASD served by participating teachers will be examined. A total of 79 regional-, district-, and school-level personnel will also participate in social network interviews. Mixed methods, including surveys, administrative data, and observational checklists, will be used to gather in-depth information about system-wide malleable factors that relate to positive teacher implementation of EBPs and student outcomes. Multi-level modeling will be used to assess system-wide malleable factors related to EBP implementation which will be linked to the trainer, teacher, and student outcomes and examined based on moderators (e.g., district size, Special Education Local Plan Area structure, teachers’ ASD experience). Finally, a dynamic social network approach will be used to map EBP-related connectivity across all levels of the system for selected regions. Dynamic network analysis will be used to gauge the degree to which and ways that EBP trainings, resources, and interventions are shared (or not shared) among school staff.DiscussionResults are expected to inform the development of system-wide interventions to improve the school-based implementation of EBPs for students with ASD.

Many strategies may be used by external consultants (such as treatment developers and trainers) and internal program leaders to support evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. The goal of this study was to identify which educational implementation strategies are considered by therapists to be most helpful, through which mechanisms, and whether these strategies are linked to EBP use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 60 therapists, and 826 therapists completed surveys regarding their perceptions of educational implementation strategies and reported delivery of EBPs within a system-driven, multiple-EBP implementation effort. Using sequential QUAL → QUAN mixed methods, we first identified qualitative themes. Next, we conducted a multilevel logistic regression to examine how quantitative survey items corresponding with qualitative themes predicted EBP use. Initial qualitative thematic analyses revealed four implementation strategies perceived as essential for EBP delivery: connection to a community of trained therapists, ongoing consultation/supervision, availability of internal supervisors trained in the EBP, and access to EBP materials and resources. Quantitative results showed strategies related to connections with a community of trained therapists (i.e., percentage of other therapists at an agency with EBP training and delivery experience as opposed to those who are only trained in the EBP), ongoing consultation/supervision, and having an internal supervisor trained in the EBP (receiving EBP-specific in-house supervision) were significantly associated with EBP use while receiving EBP boosters was not. The closest quantitative indicator corresponding to access to EBP resources, EBP web-based training, was not associated with EBP use. Therapist reported these strategies supported EBP delivery through exposure to other therapists' cases, guidance/feedback, emotional support, and removing logistic barriers to EBP use. These findings demonstrate how considering therapist perspectives and creating a network of EBP support via supervisors, consultants, and a community of therapists experienced in the EBP may be particularly critical to EBP delivery. Public mental health systems are increasingly implementing multiple evidence-based practices (EBPs). There are many strategies that may be used by external consultants (such as treatment developers and trainers) and internal program leaders to support EBP implementation. The goal of this study was to identify which of these internal and external implementation strategies are considered by therapists to be most helpful and how these strategies are linked with continued use of EBPs. First, qualitative interviews with therapists revealed the following strategies are key for supporting their delivery of EBPs: (1) connections to a community of trained therapists, (2) ongoing consultation/supervision, (3) having an internal supervisor at their program who was trained in the EBP, and (4) access to EBP materials and logistic resources. Next, quantitative analyses of survey data examined whether any of the strategies therapists identified as most helpful predicted the continued delivery of EBPs by therapists after initial training. Results confirmed that strategies involving connections with a community of therapists trained in and experienced with the EBP, ongoing consultation/supervision, and having an internal supervisor trained in the EBP were each significantly associated with EBP use. Therapist reported these strategies supported EBP delivery through exposure to other therapists' cases, guidance/feedback, emotional support, and removing logistic barriers to EBP use. These findings can assist systems and programs in prioritizing implementation strategies to support the sustained delivery of EBPs.

Many issues arise in the discussion of the evidence-based practice (EBP) movement and implementation science in special education and specific educational practices for students with severe disabilities. Yet cultural adaptations of EBPs, which have emerged as an area of research in other fields, are being left out as a focus of EBP discourse. The aim of this article is to examine key challenges and concerns in the movement of EBP and implementation science in special education, as well as the emergence of cultural adaptation of EBPs in other fields. Apart from an argument for the need of cultural adaptations of EBPs in special education, we discuss guiding principles and provide recommendations for developing culturally adapted EBPs in special education.