Abstract
In this paper, I address several related questions about evidence: What is common to understanding across different fields like law, science, and medicine? Can we develop a unified perspective? Could this lead to new ways of analyzing practical issues and making complex decisions where there are competing viewpoints? A widely held position is that evidence is intrinsically associated with resolving uncertainty, so from a formal point of view, it is a probabilistic concept. In contrast, I describe an approach that is based on patterns of argumentation: a feature of human behavior which is ubiquitous in everyday decision making and debate. This framework does not reject the importance of probability or other quantitative concepts for measuring confidence in evidence but offers a logical perspective that accommodates probabilistic methods when they are practical but offers a sound, flexible, and robust alternative when they are not.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.