Abstract

BackgroundRenal graft cortical necrosis (GCN) is a catastrophic cause of graft failure. We evaluated the incidence, causes, management, and outcome of GCN across two decades from our center. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of transplant patients who had biopsy-proven GCN transplanted between 2000 and 2020. The clinical details, immunological workup, induction, maintenance regimen, causes of cortical necrosis, and the outcomes were compared between the first period 2000–2012, and the second period 2013–2020, when Flow cytometric and Luminex based crossmatch were included in the workup plan. ResultsAmong 2333 live ABO-compatible renal transplants, 37 (0.015%) patients (36 patients between 2000 and 2012 and 1 between 2013 and 2020) developed GCN (60% had diffuse and 40% patchy GCN) at a median of 8 days after transplantation.Twenty-six (60%) received ATG, 4 received plasmapheresis and ATG (10.8%) as antirejection therapy. The cyclosporine-based regimen was associated with a higher risk of GCN (RR 2.54; 95% CI 1.26 to 5.12, p = 0.009), whereas tacrolimus-based therapy had a lower risk (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79, p = 0.009). The introduction of flow cytometry and DSA assay has significantly decreased the incidence of acute rejection and GCN. Only one patient had GCN during the 2013–2020 period because of graft's mucormycosis. Twenty-five (67.56%) patients had no recovery, and 12 (32.43%) had partial recovery of graft function. ConclusionGCN is mainly associated with rejection, and cyclosporin-based maintenance regimen had a higher incidence. The remarkable decrease in GCN after 2012 onwards could be attributed to the use of Flowcytometry, Luminex-based DSA assays, and tacrolimus-based regimens.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.