Abstract
Methods of calculating evapotranspiration are subject to uncertainty. It is important to evaluate their uncertainty. Using 54 years of data, this study evaluated the uncertainty values of monthly reference crop evapotranspiration calculated with the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves-Samani methods. The objective of this study was to determine the range of variation in the results of each method. It was found that for both methods, the bandwidth uncertainty obtained with 95% confidence interval was more in warm months than in cold months, and the mean and variance by the Hargreaves-Samani method were always less than by the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method. The uncertainty value of the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method was more than of the Hargreaves-Samani method, because the number of parameters used in the FAO-56 method was more than in Hargreaves-Samani method which increased uncertainty resources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
