Abstract
Integrated units that combine Exhaust Air Heat Pumps (EAHPs) with Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) and, in some instances, Domestic Hot Water Storage (DHW), are becoming increasingly popular in the domestic market across Europe with over 24,000 EAHPs purchased in the EU in 2017 alone. Early research into using EAHPs demonstrated energy savings being conservatively between 20% and 50% when compared to conventional systems. Recent research has suggested that, in reality, EAHPs in-use energy performance can be worse than that estimated by various standardised theoretical assessment methods (COP/SPF in the range of 0.4 to 6.0). More worryingly, published data on this in-use operation is effectively non-existent for NZEB type dwellings and few studies have stress tested the robustness of the EN standards in accounting for the effects of in-use operation. The study presented in this paper investigated whether the standard methods used to predict in-use energy performance are sufficiently robust and adequately capture operational performance for EAHP systems. The energy performance of two identical EAHP systems in Ireland (one rural/ one urban) were monitored for close to 12 months. During the live in-use monitoring period, the EAHPs had ‘heat-pump/heat recovery only’ operating mode ratios of 16%/84% and 22%/77% for rural and urban systems respectively. The average HRE in-use efficiency was 92% and 64% for the rural and urban systems respectively. While the manufacturers stated Seasonal performance factors (SPF) ranging from 2.2 (for DHW) to 5.8 (for Space Heating), the average in-use SPF was found to vary between 1.7 and 3.8 depending on the boundary reported and the location. More research is urgently required in order to bring much needed clarity for designers and energy assessors regarding which boundaries can be universally applied to EAHP systems. Given the range of SPF which could apply to the HP’s examined, the paper highlights the importance of ensuring that realistic indicators of in use performance are provided, aiding appropriate decision-making by policymakers, industry and end-users.
Highlights
With the transition to low energy housing across Europe integrated units that combine Exhaust Air Heat Pumps (EAHPs) with Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) and, in some instances, Domestic Hot Water (DHW) Storage, are becoming increasingly popular in the domestic market with over 320,000 EAHP systems installed to date [1], and 24,000 of these purchased in 2017 alone [1]
The aim of this paper is to report field study results from an in-use energy performance investigation of two EAHPs located in PassivHaus certified dwellings Ireland, one in a rural setting and one in an urban setting
The dwellings utilised in this study were two PassivHaus certified buildings, constructed in 2014 and 2015, both achieving A1 ratings in national Building Energy Rating (BER, EPC equivalent) certificates. Both were detached houses with floor areas of 256m2 and 288m2 respectively. Both buildings had the same combined HRV and EAHP system for ventilation, Space Heating (SH) and DHW purposes with an additional separate air to water or ground to water heat pump used as part of an underfloor heating system that are both capable of generating hot water as well but were not covered in this study
Summary
With the transition to low energy housing across Europe integrated units that combine Exhaust Air Heat Pumps (EAHPs) with Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) and, in some instances, Domestic Hot Water (DHW) Storage, are becoming increasingly popular in the domestic market with over 320,000 EAHP systems installed to date [1], and 24,000 of these purchased in 2017 alone [1], (less than 1000 of the total EU EAHP stock is in Ireland [1]). Manufacturers typically offer bench data for energy performance of HPs based on standardised test points and this is valuable in early design stage decision making for designers given the building or system details are understandably unavailable The paper provides an overview of the systems and how their performance was monitored, presents results from the field study and discusses how these results might be reconciled with the standardised approaches to calculating SPFs
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
