Abstract
The role of buildings in the context of addressing the consequences of climate change and the energy deficit is becoming increasingly important due to their share in the overall amount of green house gas (GHG) emissions and rapidly growing domestic energy consumption worldwide. Adherence to a sustainability agenda requires ever-increasing attention to all stages of a building′s life, as such approach allows for the consideration of environmental impacts of a building, from design, through construction stages, until the final phase of a building′s life—demolition. A life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most recognized and adopted models for the evaluation of the environmental performance of materials and processes. This paper aims to perform an LCA of four different types of residential buildings in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. The assessment primarily considered embodied energy and GHG emissions as key assessment indicators. Findings suggest that the operational stage contributed to more than half of the GHG emissions in all the cases. The results of the study indicate that there is a dependence between the comfort levels and the impact of the buildings on the environment. The higher the comfort levels, the higher the impacts in terms of the CO2 equivalent. This conclusion is most likely to be related to the fact that the higher the comfort level, the higher the environmental cost of the materials. A similar correlation can be observed in the case of comparing building comfort levels and life-cycle impacts per user. There are fewer occupants per square meter as the comfort level increases. Furthermore, the obtained results suggest potential ways of reducing the overall environmental impact of the building envelope components.
Highlights
The consumption of energy and various products has been dramatically increasing at both national and global scales over the last several decades [1,2,3]
The methodology adopted in this study aimed to assist in assessing the life-cycle performance of typical residential buildings in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, a category that constitutes the majority of buildings in Kazakhstan
An assessment of the impacts of external walls is essential in the context of Kazakhstan0 s extremely harsh climatic conditions, with temperatures ranging from −40 to +35 degrees Celsius
Summary
The consumption of energy and various products has been dramatically increasing at both national and global scales over the last several decades [1,2,3]. Along with human activities, are causing significant negative impacts on the environment in terms of resource depletion, air contamination, and solid waste-related pollution. The construction industry and buildings, in general, are becoming one of the most significant contributors to environmental pressures. It was reported that in 2016, buildings around the world were responsible for. Processes related to the extraction of resources, manufacturing and transporting construction materials, are energy-hungry. Manufacturing construction materials such as steel and cement has been reported to Energies 2020, 13, 174; doi:10.3390/en13010174 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Published Version (
Free)
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have