Abstract

The tripartite function of faculty members in higher education includes instruction, research, and extension. Built-in into this function was to produce of instructional materials for students’ and teachers’ consumption. The objective of this study was to evaluate computer-generated instructional materials (CGIMs) used in college geometry courses. To attain this, the researchers used descriptive-evaluative design. The respondents were the twenty (20) teachers teaching Geometry and Curriculum Development. The instruments used were the worktext and multimedia efficiency rating scale, usefulness, accuracy, completeness, and appropriateness rating scale. The result shows that in terms of physical attributes, objectives, content, exercises, and evaluation, the worktext has a “very high” efficiency level while in terms of content, physical attributes, and visual clarity the multimedia presentation achieved a “very high” efficiency level. It was also found that in terms of usefulness, accuracy, completeness, and appropriateness, the developed CGIM has attained a “very high” level. This means that the developed CGIM achieved an excellent level of instructional material development. CGIM is recommended as a way to improve the achievement, mental habits, and problem-solving skills of Geometry students.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.