Abstract

Smartphones and other modern technologies have introduced multiple new forms of distraction that color the modern driving experience. While many smartphone functions aim to improve driving by providing the driver with real-time navigation and traffic updates, others, such as texting, are not compatible with driving and are often the cause of accidents. Because both functions elicit driver attention, an outstanding question is the degree to which drivers’ naturalistic interactions with navigation and texting applications differ in regard to brain and behavioral indices of distracted driving. Here, we employed functional near-infrared spectroscopy to examine the cortical activity that occurs under parametrically increasing levels of smartphone distraction during naturalistic driving. Our results highlight a significant increase in bilateral prefrontal and parietal cortical activity that occurs in response to increasingly greater levels of smartphone distraction that, in turn, predicts changes in common indices of vehicle control.

Highlights

  • Smartphones and other modern technologies have introduced multiple new forms of distraction that color the modern driving experience

  • We argue that functional near-infrared spectroscopy affords a light-weight and portable brain imaging modality that is less sensitive to movement, making it amenable to driving ­studies[26,27,28,29]

  • Follow-up comparisons identified significantly lower lateral acceleration for open-ended text responding (OER) and GPS events compared to text banner, forced-choice text responding (FCR), and normal control driving

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smartphones and other modern technologies have introduced multiple new forms of distraction that color the modern driving experience. Despite classifying texting as one of the most dangerous tasks to do while driving (second only to driving drunk), 51% of drivers reported interacting (i.e., sending/receiving texts, navigation) with their phone while ­driving[6] This is troubling, as drivers distracted by a secondary task contributed to over 22% of all crashes and nearcrashes, with over one third of these secondary tasks involving interaction with a wireless ­device[7,8]. Previous research using fMRI has identified the engagement of a network of brain regions including the motor, parietal, occipital, prefrontal, and cerebellar cortices that are commonly elicited during driving t­asks[11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] Common driving maneuvers such as turning, reversing, stopping, and monitoring other cars and traffic rules have all been shown to elicit activity from these r­ egions[16,17]. Because movement is severely restricted in fMRI studies, the ability to interact with a smartphone as one normally would is not possible

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.