Abstract

International guidelines/standards for the protection of humans from radiofrequency exposure have set a limit by assuming the lowest threshold for a classical heating effect, among other effects. However, no computational study has been reported that evaluates temperature rise due to contact currents. This paper presents the computational dosimetry of a specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature rise due to touch contact currents in the frequency range 100 kHz to 100 MHz using a detailed numerical model of a human hand. Tissue dielectric properties obtained from a conventional 4-Cole-Cole dispersion model have often been considered in dosimetry studies. However, a comparison of the computed electrical impedance with experimental results suggests that the conductivity of the subcutaneous fat in the finger should be higher than the 4-Cole-Cole values-potentially attributable to collagen fibers. We then proposed a set of tissue dielectric conductivities estimated from recent measurement results of conductivities for the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue. Consequently, the computed electrical impedances exhibited good agreement with the measured ones. In addition, the SAR and temperature rise obtained using the proposed tissue conductivities were lower than those obtained using 4-Cole-Cole values. Therefore, the SAR and temperature rise obtained based on the 4-Cole-Cole dispersion model may be overstated. We also observed that the steady-state maximum temperature rise due to the contact current at the guidance/limit level was equivalent to 2.5 °C, which is the maximum permissible temperature rise (5 °C) divided by a reduction factor of 2.

Highlights

  • Two international standardization bodies exist for human protection from electromagnetic fields: the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES)

  • Our computational results suggested that the electrical conductivity of the actual skin and subcutaneous fat are higher than those obtained from the commonly used 4-Cole-Cole dispersion model

  • This implies that the specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature rise may be overestimated using conventional parameters or the conductivity of the 4-Cole-Cole dispersion model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Two international standardization bodies exist for human protection from electromagnetic fields: the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES). These two bodies recently revised their guidelines/standards limiting human exposure to the Electromagnetic fields in the radiofrequency (RF) range— above 100 kHz [1] and from 0 Hz to 300 GHz [2], respectively.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.