Abstract

To handle final state equality constraints, two types of penalty functions are evaluated and compared in solving three optimal control problems. Both the absolute value penalty function and the quadratic penalty function with shifting terms yielded the optimal control policy in each case. The quadratic penalty function with shifting terms gave the optimum more accurately, and the approach to the optimum is less oscillatory than with the use of absolute value penalty function. In solving for the optimal control in the third example, the use of the absolute value penalty function required a series of runs to get the performance index to within 0.035% of the optimum. A further advantage in using the quadratic penalty function is obtaining sensitivity information with respect to the final state constraints from the shifting terms.KeywordsPenalty functionsiterative dynamic programmingoptimal controlstate constraints

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.