Abstract

A total of 356 finishing pigs (DNA; 241 × 600; initially 196.3 ± 2.43 lb) were used in a 44-d growth trial to evaluate nutritional strategies to reduce growth rate of pigs beyond 200 lb body weight. A total of 3 diets were manufactured (control, Lys-deficient, and corn) and arranged into 4 nutritional strategies. In stage 1 (d 0 to 28), pens received one of two dietary treatments (control or Lys-deficient). Then on d 28, pens of pigs previously fed the control diet were separated into 2 groups, one fed the control diet and the other the corn diet. Pens of pigs previously fed the Lys-deficient diet were separated into 2 groups, one fed the Lys-deficient diet and the other the corn diet. The control diet contained 13.0% CP and 0.70% standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys; the Lys-deficient diet contained 10.3% CP and 0.50% SID Lys; and the corn diet contained 8.1% CP and 0.18% SID Lys. There were 9 to 10 pigs per pen and 9 pens per treatment. Pens were assigned to 1 of the 4 nutritional strategies in a randomized complete block design with initial weight as a blocking factor. In stage one (d 0 to 28), pigs fed the Lys-deficient diet had decreased (P < 0.001) ADG, F/G, and d 28 BW compared to pigs fed the control diet. There was no evidence of difference in ADFI between control and Lys-deficient diet. In stage 2 (d 28 to 44), pigs fed the corn diet had decreased (P < 0.05) ADG and poorer (P < 0.05) F/G compared to pigs fed the control or Lys-deficient diets. Pigs fed the Lys-deficient diet in both stages had decreased (P < 0.05) ADG and poorer (P < 0.05) F/G compared to pigs fed the control diet in both stages. For the overall period (d 0 to 44), pigs fed the Lys-deficient diet (stage 1) then corn diet (stage 2) had decreased (P < 0.05) ADG and final BW, and poorer (P < 0.05) F/G compared to the three other treatments. There was no evidence of difference for ADG, F/G, and final BW between pigs fed the Lys-deficient diet in both stages and pigs fed the control diet (stage 1) then corn diet (stage 2). Pigs of these two treatments had decreased (P < 0.05) ADG, F/G, and final BW, compared to pigs fed the control diet in both stages. For

Highlights

  • The US pork industry experienced a substantial reduction in the ability to process market pigs due to plant closures attributed to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic

  • There was no evidence of difference in ADFI between control and Lys-deficient diet

  • For the overall period (d 0 to 44), pigs fed the Lys-deficient diet corn diet had decreased (P < 0.05) ADG and final BW, and poorer (P < 0.05) F/G compared to the three other treatments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The US pork industry experienced a substantial reduction in the ability to process market pigs due to plant closures attributed to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. With the reduced ability for processors to accept delivery of market animals, animals grow beyond their intended market weight which makes them too large for the infrastructure of the facility. Producers were forced to utilize a variety of strategies to reduce the growth rate of pigs. Incorporating strategies that could reduce growth rate to prevent animals from becoming too large is exceptionally important for this situation. There was little information in the literature regarding strategies to limit growth rates of heavy weight pigs. Our objective was to evaluate nutritional strategies to reduce growth rate of pigs beyond 200-lb body weight

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.